Discriminatory Statistics

Bibliographic Data

ID5369974
AuthorsErnesto Laclau (corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume26
Issue2-3
Pages391-415
Publication date2012-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCultural Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0950-2386 • E-ISSN: 1466-4348
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09502386.2011.647651
OpenAlexW4239273757
LanguageEN
Citations received8

In the reply to his critics and interlocutors, Laclau clarifies his position regarding a series of concepts such as representation, fraternity (or democratic solidarity), identification, signification, affect, extimacy, spectacle and social sedimentation as they arise in or pertain to his theory of ‘populism and populist reason’. In the process of those clarifications, Laclau also explains how his views differ from other relevant thinkers such as Hannah Pitkin (on ‘representation’), Jurgen Habermas (on ‘new social movements’), Guy Debord (on ‘spectacle’) and Jacques Lacan (on ‘extimacy’)

Aesthetics · Democracy · Epistemology · Humanities · Political science · Politics · Populism · Psychoanalysis · Representation (politics · Sociology · Solidarity · Spectacle · Contemporary Cultural and Social Studies · Law · Philosophy · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics · Psychology · Religious studies

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub