Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Comparing Direct and Indirect Measures of Just Rewards

What Have We Learned

Bibliographic Data

ID5452902
AuthorsB Markovsky (0000-0001-7925-4297, University of South Carolina), Kimmo Eriksson (0000-0002-7164-0924, Mälardalen University, Stockholm, Sweden, and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden)
Year2012
Volume41
Issue1
Pages240-245
Publication date2012-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociological Methods & Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0049-1241 • E-ISSN: 1552-8294
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0049124112448361
OpenAlexW2085869855
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited2

We offer the first comparison between 'direct' and 'indirect' methods for measuring perceptions of distributive justice in reward allocations. The direct method simply asks respondents what they would consider to be a fair salary for a particular person in a given set of circumstances. In contrast, the indirect method infers fair salaries from respondents' judgments about the relative unfairness of hypothetical salaries. The particular indirect method that we will assess is a vignette survey technique pioneered by Jasso and Rossi (1977) and used in a number of more recent publications. The vignettes describe characteristics of a hypothetical employee, with the objective of deriving what respondents believe to be the just reward for that employee. Our experimental test suggests that the two methods yield incompatible results and that neither is immune to bias. The indirect method also suffers from a type of specification error that leads to untenable results. We conclude by suggesting directions for new research to gain a better understanding of these problems and, ultimately, to circumvent them

Econometrics · Economics · Statistics · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Mathematics · Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Sociology of Justice

    Open Access•Stefan Liebig, Carl Sauer et al.•2016

  • Legitimation of earnings inequality between regular and non-regular workers

    Open Access•Shin Arita, Kikuko Nagayoshi et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • First Equals Most Important? Order Effects in Vignette-Based Measurement

    Open Access•Katrin Auspurg, Annette Jäckle•Sociological Methods & Research•2017

  • "Coherent Arbitrariness"

    Dan Ariely, G Loewenstein et al.•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2003

  • Distributive Justice and CEO Compensation

    Open Access•G Jasso, Eva M Meyersson Milgrom•Acta Sociologica•2008

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,3
Citation span2016 - 2023 (8)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae