Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) M. Candea , Oswyn Murray
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE
ANO 2019
TIPO Book
PERIÓDICO Social Network Analysis and Mining
ISSN 1869-5450
E-ISSN 1869-5469
DOI 10.3167/sa.2019.630404
CITAÇÕES 1
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-14
MD5 B43F68985D32B116F3010A13AFE3F769
MD5 9ce7ae3f79b002867ea8b1aa2301bf6f

Resumo

This article reflects on the power and dangers of diagrams as a mode of anthropological exposition, comparing this particular form of non-text to the brief dalliance of mid-century anthropology with algebraic and logical formulae. It has been claimed that diagrams, like formulae, are clearer, simpler, or less deceptive than textual argument. By contrast, this article argues that diagrams are just as slippery and tricky as words, but that images and words slip and slide in different ways. Holding both diagrams and words together when building an argument enables not only a specific kind of rigor, but also moments of unexpected theoretical invention. This technique of holding together contrasting heuristics scales up as a productive epistemic device for anthropology more broadly.

Ferramentas