The boundaries of grievability
When do migrant lives matter to political representatives in Slovakia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5602015 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mária Mokrá (0009-0005-7020-250X, Comenius University Bratislava, corresponding author), Ivana Rapoš Božič (0000-0001-6605-1765, Masaryk University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 9 |
| Pages | 1-20 |
| Publication date | 2025-10-14 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | New Community (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0047-9586 • E-ISSN: 1469-9451 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/1369183x.2025.2564867 |
| OpenAlex | W4415177578 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 44 |
The responses of Central European countries to the mid-2010s migration ‘crisis’ and the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 have been strikingly different, moving from strong anti-migrant stances to a wave of solidarity. Do these differences imply a shift in the political discourse on migration? We explore this question through the boundaries of grievability, a newly developed theoretical framework that adopts Butler’s concept of grievability for the cultural sociological analysis of political discourse on migration. This framework allows us to inductively uncover the conditions under which human lives matter. Focusing on the case of Slovakia, we show that the differentiated responses to migrants arriving in these two periods are in fact sustained by the same boundaries of grievability that locate them on opposing sides, based on their perceived: (1) ethnoracial closeness; (2) legitimacy of suffering; (3) economic contribution; and (4) contribution to the project of ‘Europeanness.’ The uneven allocation of grievability reflects complex hierarchies in which the migrants are posited in relation to each other, as well as to the native-born population. Based on our findings, we argue that the responses of Slovak political representatives to migration must be contextualised by the country’s ambiguous positioning within the hierarchy of Europeanness
Ethnic group · Immigration · Politics · Transnationalism · Migration and Labor Dynamics · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Methods of Critical Discourse Studies
The Discourse of Politics in Action
European Others
Grounded Theory and Theoretical Coding
The Boundaries of Belonging
Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis
Colonial Exceptionalism
Critical Discourse Analysis
Foreigner, migrant, or refugee? How laypeople label those who cross borders
Deserving of Assistance
Emotions in the European Union's decision-making
Shrinking spaces of asylum
Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis
Imagining Ukraine
The Production of (Un)deserving and (Un)acceptable
Transiting From the East to the ‘Core’ West of Europe
The “Yellow Spot” on Europe’s “Snow White Body”
The Refugee Paradox During Wartime in Europe
Bright vs. blurred boundaries
Revisiting Pan-Slavism in the Contemporary Perspective
The Theory of Cultural Racism
We Have Always Been like This
Islamophobia and the Europeanness of the other Europe
Eurowhite” Conceit, “Dirty White” Ressentment
Migration, vulnerability and the complexity of violence
The Ukrainian Refugee “Crisis” and the (Re)production of Whiteness in Austrian and Czech Public Politics
The Migration and Refugee Crisis in Political Discourse in Slovakia
Why Islam is like Spanish
The Hierarchy of Victims
East–west inequalities and the ambiguous racialisation of ‘Eastern Europeans
Political migration discourses on social media
Refugees Separated by the Global Color Line
Racial Europeanization
Who is a ‘true refugee’? Polish political discourse in 2021-2022
What is missing? Cultural processes and causal pathways to inequality
Neoliberal nationalism and immigration policy
Racial capitalism and the production of difference in Helsinki and Warsaw
Affective Economies
Undoing the Demos
Toward an Ethnoracial Ontology for the Study of Race and Ethnicity
Europe and the Silence about Race
The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |