Trauma management

Chernobyl in Belarus and Ukraine

Bibliographic Data

ID5609250
AuthorsE Zhukova (0000-0003-1559-6305, Aarhus University, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume67
Issue2
Pages195-215
Publication date2016-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Sociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-1315 • E-ISSN: 1468-4446
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1468-4446.12198
PMID27191056
OpenAlexW2404786851
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited27

Although the Chernobyl nuclear disaster happened in the Soviet Union in 1986, we still do not know how the most affected states - Ukraine and Belarus - have managed this tragedy since independence. Drawing on the concept of cultural trauma, this article compares Chernobyl narratives in Belarus and Ukraine over the past 28 years. It shows that national narratives of Chernobyl differ, representing the varying ways in which the state overcomes trauma. Our understanding of post-communist transformations can be improved by analysing trauma management narratives and their importance for new national identity construction. These narratives also bring new insights to our vision of cultural trauma by linking it to ontological insecurity. The article demonstrates how the state can become an arena of trauma process as it commands material and symbolic resources to deal with trauma. In general, it contributes to a better understanding of how the same traumatic event can become a source of solidarity in one community, but a source of hostility in another

Dismemberment · Historical trauma · Literature · Narrative · National identity · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · Solidarity · State (computer science · Eastern European Communism and Reforms · History · Law · Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration · Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis · Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub