The politics of the post-conflict and post-disaster nexus in Nepal
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5680673 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elly Harrowell (0000-0002-1957-4114, Coventry University, corresponding author), Alpaslan Ozerdem (0000-0001-5931-9532, Coventry University) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 181-205 |
| Publication date | 2018-05-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Conflict Security and Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1467-8802 • E-ISSN: 1478-1174 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14678802.2018.1468531 |
| OpenAlex | W2799317877 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 56 |
The intersection of the post-conflict reconstruction processes established in Nepal’s Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) in 2006, and the post-disaster reconstruction effort that swung into action following the country’s devastating earthquakes in 2015 provides an important opportunity to observe to what extent synergies between the two reconstruction processes have been successfully exploited. This paper critically examines these two processes, demonstrating that despite a growing recognition of the value of linking these processes by researchers, in practice they often remain separate. It shows how certain actors have framed the post-disaster reconstruction as unrelated to post-conflict activities in order to avoid what they perceive as the risk of politicising – and thus delaying – the post-disaster reconstruction process. The paper suggests that this is a mistake. The process of post-disaster reconstruction is innately political and intricately entwined with the very same issues and activities the post-conflict reconstruction process attempted to address. Moreover, we argue that the entire process is taking place within a political context which is a product of the as-yet unresolved post-conflict polity. Any reconstruction process that does not take this into account risks being undermined by the same challenges that underpinned the country’s conflict
Geography · Mistake · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Polity · Sociology · Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration · Computer Science · Disaster Management and Resilience · Engineering · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security
When the mountain broke
Community‐led reconstruction, social inclusion and participation in post‐earthquake Nepal
Post-Disaster Reconstruction, Well-being and Sustainable Development Goals
From reaction to prevention
Against the trend
Before the dust settled
Everyday realities of reintegration
Post-conflict disaster governance in Nepal
The Angry Earth
Learning from the history of disaster vulnerability and resilience research and practice for climate change
Climate Change and Violent Conflict
The Discovery of Grounded Theory
Post-Conflict Reconstruction
Disaster Research
Disaster Diplomacy
Post-Disaster Reconstruction
After the Conflict
The Moral Imagination
Urban Hazard Mitigation
Contemporary conflict resolution
The ‘local turn’ in peacebuilding
Times of interregnum
Ending Wars and Building Peace
Hybrid Peace
Humanitarianism Sacrificed
Disaster politics
Complex Emergencies and the Crisis of Developmentalism
Reconstruction as modernisation
The Local Turn in Peace Building
Women and Post-Conflict Reconstruction
Civil Resistance and Conflict Transformation
Ethnic conflict, the state and the tsunami disaster in Sri Lanka
Peace in the wake of disaster? Secessionist conflicts and the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami
Natural Disasters and the Risk of Violent Civil Conflict
From Insurgency to Democracy
Political Aftershocks
Participatory Intervention
Sustained drought, vulnerability and civil conflict in Sub-Saharan Africa
Empowering peace
Climate resilience in fragile and conflict-affected societies
Geography, poverty and conflict in Nepal
States of fragility
Dead letter or living document? Ten years of the Code of Conduct for disaster relief
Conflict, the Continuum and Chronic Emergencies
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,14 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |