Political leverage and UN peacekeeping

The case of Unoci's withdrawal from Côte d'Ivoire

Bibliographic Data

ID5680946
AuthorsRobyn Caplan (0000-0002-6407-3116, University of Oxford, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume24
Issue2
Pages111-125
Publication date2024-03-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueConflict Security and Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1467-8802 • E-ISSN: 1478-1174
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14678802.2024.2335733
OpenAlexW4394610531
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited12

The United Nations Operation in Côte d’Ivoire (UNOCI) is widely regarded as having been a successful peacekeeping operation. However, UNOCI bequeathed a number of challenges to Côte d’Ivoire which represented ‘unfinished business’ on UNOCI’s part. The continuing challenges are attributable in part to UNOCI’s limited political leverage vis-à-vis the sovereign Ivorian authorities, the consequence of which was partial and/or inconsistent implementation by these authorities of reforms designed to safeguard peace and security in the former conflict-ridden country. The experience highlights the limits of the political leverage that a peacekeeping operation may wield vis-à-vis a host-state government as it endeavours to implement its peacekeeping mandate, especially as closure draws near. Political leverage rarely figures in analyses of peacekeeping operations but given that peacekeeping performance is often evaluated in relation to the quality of the peace which prevails in a host state in the aftermath of a peacekeeping exit, the focus on political leverage adds an important factor of consideration to the evaluation exercise, in the case of Côte d’Ivoire and more broadly

Cote d ivoire · Humanities · Peacekeeping · Political science · Politics · Computer Science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Development and Aid · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security · Philosophy · Public Administration

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access