International politics

I imagine an IR that (1) begins with conquest and the colonial experience, instead of Westphalia, (2) focuses attention on thinking and feeling IR; and (3) sees contemporary neo–neo debates as trapped within fractures in the enlightenment vision that we need to move beyond.Keywords: Todorovcanonthinking and feeling IR Additional informationNotes on contributorsDavid L. BlaneyDavid L. Blaney, James Wallace Professor of Political Science, Macalester College, St. Paul, MN, USA, works on the political and social theory of international relations and international political economy. With Naeem Inayatullah, he is the author of International Relations and the Problem of Difference (Routledge, 2004) and Savage Economics: Wealth, Poverty and the Temporal Walls of Capitalism (Routledge, 2010). With Arlene B. Tickner, he has edited Thinking International Relations Differently (Routledge, 2012) and Claiming the International (Routledge, 2013), both of which explore the possibilities of a more genuinely international IR

International relations · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · European Union Policy and Governance · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Development and Aid · Law