Community resistance and the role of justice in shale gas development in the United Kingdom
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5696201 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Meg Sherval (0000-0003-0740-3542, University of Newcastle Australia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 222-233 |
| Publication date | 2023-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Geographical Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1745-5863 • E-ISSN: 1745-5871 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1745-5871.12575 |
| OpenAlex | W4310207268 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 45 |
Global energy policies embracing a transition to unconventional oil and gas development are hallmarks of many developed nations. Among these, the United Kingdom has framed the development of shale gas as one means to transition from high-carbon fossil-fuel consumption to low-carbon alternatives. Yet the introduction of this industry and recent legislation associated with it have not been without controversy. Communities throughout the United Kingdom are engaged in sustained debates concerning climate change, health, the scale of extraction footprints, securitisation, and governance. Places such as Kirby Misperton, the focus of this article, are representative of many villages where questions abound about the role of justice at all stages and scales of governmental decision-making. Using a legal geographic lens, this article examines narratives among local residents who are actively resisting the arrival of unconventional gas. I consider how the relationships between and among energy transition, policy, and justice have been interpreted by communities and argue for inequity and risk to be addressed in more transparent ways. I contend that highlighting counter-narratives remains essential if powerful arguments by governments and others are to be negated. Fundamentally, true justice can only prevail when all stakeholders are considered legitimate and their opinions valid
Corporate governance · Economic Justice · Economics · Environmental justice · Geography · Legislation · Narrative · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities · Law · Mining and Resource Management
The coal story
A safe operating space for humanity
Environmental justice and attachment to place
Environmental Justice and Land Use Conflict
The geopolitics of energy system transformation
Shale Gas Development and Community Distress
Is the gas industry a good neighbour? A comparison of UK and Australia experiences in terms of procedural fairness and distributive justice
Fracturing planners
Embodied energy injustices
Public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing for shale gas and oil in the United States and Canada
Missing the Connection
Willful knitting? Contemporary Australian craftivism and feminist histories
Conflicted transitions
Strange bedfellows or an aligning of values? Exploration of stakeholder values in an alliance of concerned citizens against coal seam gas mining
Geographies of environmental justice
Fracking Lancashire
Value, Identity and Place
Competing Perceptions of the Rural Idyll
Exploring the minescape
Psychoterratic geographies of the Upper Hunter region, Australia
Engaged witnessing
Legal Geography
The bomb in my backyard, the serpent in my house
Silences in the boom
Theorising environmental justice
Re-visiting Nimby
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |