Heritage destruction and cultural rights

Insights from Bagan in Myanmar

Bibliographic Data

ID5700530
AuthorsAnne-Laura Kraak (Deakin University, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume24
Issue9
Pages998-1013
Publication date2018-10-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Heritage Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1352-7258 • E-ISSN: 1470-3610
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13527258.2018.1430605
OpenAlexW2791607291
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited38

Recently, the UN Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights has stated that the intentional destruction of cultural heritage is a violation of cultural rights. The Rapporteur examines a timely issue but bases her statement on narrow understandings ‘heritage’ as irreplaceable and ‘destruction’ as ideologically motivated and aggressive. This reinforces hegemonic ideas about heritage and what constitutes its destruction. In this article, I discuss the case of Bagan in Myanmar to illustrate the limitations of the Rapporteur’s statement. In Bagan, whether and how ‘heritage’ should be protected has been the topic of controversy. By implication what is – or is not – considered intentional destruction is contested. Ambiguity about the meaning of cultural rights, the dissonant nature of heritage, the subjectivity of destruction, and complex multi-layered motivations behind ‘destructive’ practices make overarching statement about the destruction of cultural heritage and cultural rights violations too bold and call for more nuance and contextualised research

Cultural heritage · Political science · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Cambodian History and Society · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Law

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub