Text and object
The Bus Shelter That Became Cultural Heritage
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5700882 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Halldis Elina Valestrand, Halldis Valestrand (UiT The Arctic University of Norway, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 81-98 |
| Publication date | 2015-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Heritage Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1352-7258 • E-ISSN: 1470-3610 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13527258.2014.914558 |
| OpenAlex | W2015256404 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 22 |
In order to meet the increasing critique of official heritage as elitist and hegemonic, several attempts have been made to become more inclusive, participatory and democratic. The Norwegian Directorate for Cultural Heritage undertook an interesting and surprising move when they decided to grant 12 ‘everyday’ sites Special Protection Orders as a contribution to the Norwegian 2009 Cultural Year. An assumption is that such an approach could represent a particular challenge for heritage experts by broadening the perspective on what to include and exclude in their appraisals. This article examines how one of the chosen sites, an unusual bus shelter, was constructed as official heritage, by critically examining the narratives the heritage authorities produced to sustain their listing of this object. A central argument is that the Norwegian heritage authorities contributed to construct the bus shelter as ostensibly harmless by creating it as a symbol of a rather vague local past, while the object from the outset represents a potentially dangerous and ambiguous object containing lots of complex history. It discusses how the textual construction of the bus shelter’s relation to its locality, a small mining community, tends to bolster and reinforce the impression of a masculinist society and a dominant company, and thereby forecloses alternative visions, in contrast with the initial intentions of the everyday perspective on heritage
Aesthetics · Cultural heritage · Cultural heritage management · Democracy · Environmental ethics · Industrial heritage · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Values · Vision · Anthropology · Archaeological Research and Protection · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Law · Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
The Past is a Foreign Country
In Defense of Things
How Societies Remember
Narratives in Social Science Research
Industrial Ruins
Uses of Heritage
Heritage, Labour and the Working Classes
Making History
Authoritative Governance
The cultural representation of the farming landscape
Father and Ford revisited
Serving Up Culture
The Utility of Discourse Analysis to Heritage Studies
Heritage Pasts and Heritage Presents
In the spirit of self-mockery? Labour heritage and identity in the Potteries
Labour's heritage
The politics of community heritage
Rough Work and Rugged Men
Machines and Masculine Subjectivity
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,75 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |