Creating the Administrative Constitution
The Lost One Hundred Years of American Administrative Law
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5703132 |
|---|---|
| Authors | J Rockwell, Stephen J Rockwell (St. Joseph's University New York, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 100 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 480-482 |
| Publication date | 2013-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of American History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0021-8723 • E-ISSN: 1945-2314 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jahist/jat231 |
| OpenAlex | W2041667354 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
Jerry L. Mashaw's excellent new book outlines the details of federal administrative law and practice in the late-eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, with careful attention to well-known and lesser-known case studies. It is a significant contribution, adding to a wave of recent scholarship that redefines our understanding of American political development by highlighting the complicated and robust nature of federal governance and administration in the nation's first century. Mashaw's book should help put to rest, finally, the myth of small government and primitive bureaucracy that for too long has hampered our understanding of American political and administrative development. Mashaw's main focus is on what he calls “the administrative Constitution,” by which he means the very real parts of American governance that were at work in the nation's first century—notwithstanding the “hole” in the Constitution that leaves unstated any significant discussion of administration and bureaucracy (p. 10). This hole, of course, has led to a long history of academic works and public policy discussions that view administration skeptically. Traditional scholarship and received wisdom usually see a twentieth-century administrative state replacing a small, nineteenth-century government characterized by self-executing laws, tight congressional oversight, and a few clerklike bureaucrats implementing simple and popular policies. At the extreme, some scholars, politicians, and pundits view administration—particularly rule-making, adjudicatory functions, and the exercise of administrative discretion—as unconstitutional and democratically unaccountable
Administration (probate law · Administrative discretion · Administrative law · Bureaucracy · Constitution · Corporate governance · Discretion · Economics · Government (linguistics · Management · Political science · Politics · Scholarship · Separation of powers · Sociology · State (computer science · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Public Administration
Del Ulises desatado al Ulises extraviado
Civil Servants
Positivismo jurídico, Estado de Derecho y libertad
Public Management’s Problems are Legal Problems
Revolving door governance
Guns for the Government
A Fragmented Force
Intersecções, modernizações, tradicionalismos (e derivas autoritárias) no direito administrativo do período entreguerras
The Populist Theory of the State in Early American Political Thought
A Rush and a Push and the Land Is Ours
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.83 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2024 (11) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |