Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Dealing with Proselytism in Development Cooperation

A Rights-Based and Pluralistic Approach

Bibliographic Data

ID5707249
AuthorsEmmanuel Awiah (EMMANUEL AWIAH (BA in Religions and Philosophy, St. Victor’s Major Seminary, Ghana in Affiliation with University of Ghana, Legon; BA in Sacred Theology, St. Victor’s Major Seminary, Ghana in Affiliation with Pontifical Urban University, Rome; MA in Theology and Religious Studies, Research Master: Master of Advanced Studies in Theology and Religion [STL], KU Leuven, Belgium) is a doctoral researc, corresponding author), Johan De Tavernier (0000-0002-5137-3486, JOHAN DE TAVERNIER (MA in Theology [STL] and Doctor in Theology [STD], KU Leuven) is Full Professor of Theological Ethics and Dean of the Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies at KU Leuven. He has published extensively on Laudato Si', co-edited several books on peace ethics, and published in Dutch books on animal welfare, food ethics and religion, and on the relevance of the Christian traditi)
Year2020
Volume62
Issue3
Pages525-543
Publication date2020-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Church and State (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-969X • E-ISSN: 2040-4867
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/jcs/csz058
OpenAlexW2976964988
LanguageEN

The cooperation between secular donor organisations (SDOs) and faith-based organisations (FBOs) in development is growing but proselytism continues to be one of its major stumbling blocks. The first of the SDGs is “end poverty in all its forms everywhere.” In line with that, SDOs such as the World Bank, UN, regional development banks, state institutions, and civil society organisations, consider it as part of their mission to eliminate extreme poverty. Similarly, poverty alleviation is a fundamental goal of the mission of FBOs. Nonetheless, until a few years ago, FBOs did not actively share in the development agenda of SDOs. Moreover, there was hardly any meaningful research on the role of FBOs in development. Proselytism is one of the reasons why FBOs were not welcomed into development cooperation. Though SDOs have taken some steps against proselytism, and now welcome FBOs into development cooperation based on some conditions, proselytism remains a bottleneck, undermining the effectiveness of their cooperation. Hence, there is the need to further the discussion on how to better deal with this bottleneck. In that regard, this article raises three key issues for reflection. These are: how FBOs understand and handle proselytism, how SDOs understand and handle proselytism, and an evaluation of the distinguishable approaches. The article concludes by suggesting that, rather than unilateral legislations, pursuing a nuanced, honest and all-inclusive dialogue between concerned parties - from a rights-based and pluralistic perspective - appears more helpful in dealing with the problem.

Environmental ethics · Faith · Liturgy · Sociology · Theology · Philosophy · Religion, Society, and Development · Religious studies

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae