Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Church and State in the Roberts Court

Christian Conservatism and Social Change in Ten Cases, 2005-2018. By Jerold Waltman

Bibliographic Data

ID5707337
AuthorsWilliam G Ro, WILLIAM G ROSS (Cumberland School of Law Samford University, Birmingham, Alabama, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume62
Issue1
Pages193-195
Publication date2020-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Church and State (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-969X • E-ISSN: 2040-4867
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/jcs/csz103
OpenAlexW2995945563
LanguageEN

In this tightly focused book, Jerold Waltman evaluates the extent to which ten decisions of the Roberts Court involving the First Amendment’s religion clauses have favored the interests of so-called Christian conservatives. Offering careful analyses of these cases, he concludes that nine out of the ten rulings were favorable to or favored by such Christians. Six of these were decided by five-to-four votes, in which justices who tend to favor politically “conservative” views supported the conservative Christian position. Various decisions have broadened the latitude for free exercise of religion and have provided relatively narrow definitions of what constitutes an establishment of religion, which has permitted greater interaction between church and state and has allowed government to provide more financial benefits for religious organizations. Waltman analyzes these decisions in their broader social, cultural, and political context, particularly the growth of religions outside the Judeo-Christian tradition; the sharp and sudden rise in the number of persons having no religious affiliation; ideological polarization; secularism; the gay rights movement, which has supported anti-discrimination laws that have come into conflict with free exercise claims; and what he calls a “state of siege” mentality among many conservative Christians (p. 160). He contends that these factors have eroded a longtime consensus among Protestants, Roman Catholics, and Jews that formerly provided a solid foundation for a mildly secular state and toleration of divergent religious viewpoints and practices. This has generated conflict between increasingly vocal advocates of a “militantly secular state” and Christian conservatives, who seek “open acknowledgement of the historical place of Christianity in the nation’s development” and sometimes “want public symbols and substantive government policy to openly reflect conservative Christian values” (p. 161).

Christian right · Christianity · Dissenting opinion · First amendment · Free Exercise Clause · Ideology · Political science · Politics · Secular state · Secularism · Separation of church and state · Sociology · State (computer science) · Supreme court · Toleration · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Catholicism and Religious Studies · Law · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity · Religious studies

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae