Breaking Down the Wall between Church and State
State Adoption of Religious Inclusion Legislation, 1995-2009
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5708003 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Keith Gunnar Bentele (University of Massachusetts Boston, corresponding author), Rebecca Sager (Loyola Marymount University), A Soule, Sarah A Soule (Stanford University), A Soule S A Soule, G Adler, Gary J Adler (0000-0002-0580-8362, Institute of Criminology), G Adler G Adler |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 503-533 |
| Publication date | 2014-09-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Church and State (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0021-969X • E-ISSN: 2040-4867 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jcs/css145 |
| OpenAlex | W2043795252 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
During the past twenty years, there has been a proliferation of significant, yet often overlooked, state-level legislative developments that challenge the notion of a limited role for government in the promotion or facilitation of religion and that seek to allow and protect greater religious expression in public institutions. For example, several states have passed laws that allow for religious displays or mottoes in public spaces, while other states now have mandates requiring moments of silence in public schools.1 While debates about the appropriate relationship between church and state have long been acrimonious,2 since the mid-1990s there has been a marked increase at the state level in both the type and number of laws that both directly and indirectly impact church-state relations in this regard. Specifically, state legislatures have passed 87 different laws that test the limits of late twentieth-century jurisprudence regarding church-state separation, or intentionally seek to fashion a new regime of closer church-state interaction. This new regime is characterized by largely symbolic legal protections of free exercise of religion, overt support for display of religious symbols in public settings, the facilitation of access to public funding for religious institutions, and the characterization of religion as embattled by a secular state.
Government (linguistics) · Inclusion (mineral) · Jurisprudence · Legislation · Legislature · Political science · Politics · Separation of church and state · Social science · Sociology · State (computer science) · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Public Administration · Religion and Society Interactions · Religion, Society, and Development
Forces of Secularity in the Modern World
Forces of Secularity in the Modern World
Rewinding Roe v. Wade
Creating Secular Spaces
Are the Politics of the Christian Right Linked to State Rates of the Nonreligious? The Importance of Salient Controversy
Have Christian Colleges and Universities Become More Inclusive of LGBTQ Students Since Obergefell v. Hodges
Religion-State Interaction at the Local Level
| Citations per year | 0.88 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2018 - 2022 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |