Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Processing cataphoric they amidst pronominal innovation

Bibliographic Data

ID5708420
AuthorsSteven Foley (0000-0003-2061-2488, University of Southern California, corresponding author), Byron Ahn (0000-0002-5204-6161, Princeton University)
Year2024
Volume8
Issue3
Pages289-308
Publication date2024-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Cultural Cognitive Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2520-100X • E-ISSN: 2520-1018
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s41809-024-00153-7
OpenAlexW4404463568
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited42

When they encounter a cataphoric pronoun during real-time sentence processing, the comprehender begins searching actively for a feature-matched noun that can supply its reference. The present study investigates individual variation in this active search procedure, leveraging an ongoing change in the pronoun system of North American English. The types of referents compatible with the they-series of pronouns is expanding, with an increasing number of speakers allowing definite singular referents: especially but not exclusively when referring to someone with a nonbinary gender identity. Sociolinguistic work shows that the speakers who most accept innovative usages of singular they tend to be younger, or to be non-cisgender (e.g. transgender, nonbinary). Recruiting participants representing diverse ages and gender identities, the present experiment tracked reading times of sentences involving cataphora. Results shows that cataphoric they is processed differently than cataphoric s/he, across the board. There is a significant processing cost to reading a plural noun that follows cataphoric s/he, indicating that singular cataphors evoke strong number expectations. However, the cost of reading a singular noun after they is smaller and emerges later; they seems to evoke weak number expectations. Individual differences show that those expectations are especially weak for younger participants, perhaps reflecting a higher baseline familiarity with singular they. On the other hand, course-grained gender identity (cis vs. non-cis) does not seem to be a reliable predictor of how cataphoric they is processed. Integrating insights from sociolinguistics and psycholinguistics, this study offers a novel view into ongoing language change and its manifestation in real-time processing measures

Linguistics · Natural language processing · Computer Science · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • When accessibility distinctions matter or don't

    Open Access•Nayoung Kwon, So Young Lee•Acta Psychologica•2026

  • Introduction to the special issue individual differences in language prediction

    Open Access•Azusa Ito, Aine Ito et al.•Journal of Cultural Cognitive…•2025

  • Gender conflicts in German possessives

    Open Access•Christin Schütze, Jürg Fleischer et al.•Language and Cognition•2025

  • The Plural is Semantically Unmarked

    Uli Sauerland, Jan Anderssen et al.•Linguistic Evidence•2005

  • Introducing a gender-neutral pronoun in a natural gender language

    Open Access•Marie Gustafsson Sendén, Emma Bäck et al.•Frontiers in Psychology•2015

  • Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing

    Open Access•Dale J Barr, Roger Levy et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2013

  • Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

    Open Access•David M Bates, Douglas Bates et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2015

  • Lectures on Government and Binding

    Noam Chomsky•Lectures on Government and Binding•1993

  • Individual Differences in Cue Weighting in Sentence Comprehension

    Open Access•Himanshu Yadav, Dario Paape et al.•Open MIND•2022

  • Singular they in context

    Open Access•Keir Moulton, Chung-Hye Han et al.•Glossa a journal of general…•2020

  • Gender diversity and morphosyntax

    Open Access•Lex Konnelly, Elizabeth Cowper•Glossa a journal of general…•2020

  • Maze Made Easy

    Open Access•Veronica Boyce, Richard Futrell et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2020

  • Principle B constrains the processing of cataphora

    Open Access•Dave Kush, Bronwyn Dillon et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2021

  • Processing bound-variable singular they

    Open Access•Chung-Hye Han, Chung–hye Han et al.•The Canadian Journal of…•2022

  • A thematic analysis of attitudes towards English nonbinary pronouns

    Open Access•Laura Hekanaho•Journal of Language and Sexuality•2022

  • Backwards anaphora in discourse context

    Open Access•Guy Carden•Journal of Linguistics•1982

  • Variation in English gendered pronouns

    Open Access•Kirby Conrod•Journal of Language and Sexuality•2022

  • The influence of linguistic and social attitudes on grammaticality judgments of singular 'they

    Open Access•Evan D Bradley•Language Sciences•2020

  • Impersonal uses of personal pronouns

    Open Access•Chisato Kitagawa, Adrienne Lehrer•Journal of Pragmatics•1990

  • The Processing of Plural Expressions

    Open Access•Nikole D Patson•Language and Linguistics Compass•2014

  • Peaks Beyond Phonology

    Open Access•Sali A Tagliamonte, Alexandra D''Arcy et al.•Language•2009

  • Paucity, abundance, and the theory of number

    Open Access•Daniel Harbour•Language•2014

  • Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar

    Open Access•Ann Bodine•Language in Society•1975

  • Pronouns Beyond the Binary

    Open Access•Marie Gustafsson Sendén, Emma Renström et al.•Gender & Society•2021

Citations per year3
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae