Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Politics and the media in Australia and the United Kingdom

Parallels and Contrasts

Bibliographic Data

ID5716319
AuthorsIvor Gaber (0000-0002-2425-3219, University of Sussex), Rodney Tiffen (The University of Sydney)
Year2018
Volume167
Issue1
Pages27-40
Publication date2018-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedia International Australia (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1329-878X • E-ISSN: 2200-467X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1329878x18766721
OpenAlexW2798014268
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited8

Australia and Britain share many common aspects in their democratic political and media systems, but there are also important differences. Perhaps the single most important media difference is that television has been a much more important element in the UK political communication system than it has been in Australia. The British Broadcasting Corporation is a much bigger and more central institution than the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, and commercial TV in Britain has a much stronger public service mandate. The British press has a national structure which can give it a substantive collective role, although its right-wing dominance means it has been a less-than-benign influence on public life. Both countries are facing rapid changes, with partisan political divisions in flux and the digital environment disrupting traditional media models. In this article, we seek to interrogate the commonalities and differences between the media and political systems operating in Australia and the United Kingdom. After tracing some important differences in their institutional structures, the dominant theme of our later analysis is that in both systems, and in both countries, the overarching narrative is one of disruption. And we pose the question - Will the current disruptions widen or narrow these differences

Corporation · Democracy · Dominance (genetics · Fourth Estate · Institution · Mandate · Media studies · Parallels · Political communication · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public service · Sociology · Engineering · Media Studies and Communication · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Social Media and Politics · Law · Public Administration

  • Seeing Red

    SARAH OATES, Gordon Neil Ramsay•Seeing Red•2024

  • Towards crisis protection(ism)? Covid-19 and selective de-globalization

    Open Access•Layla Branicki, Bridgette Sullivan‐Taylor et al.•Critical Perspectives on…•2021

  • Australia's television streaming market and the battle over prominence

    Open Access•Cameron Mcternan, Scott Fitzgerald•International Communication Gazette•2025

  • Journalistic Role Performance in Australia During the Covid-19 Pandemic

    Open Access•Doug Nolan, Kieran Mcguinne et al.•Journalism Practice•2024

  • Conservative advocacy journalism

    Open Access•Victoria Fielding•Journalism•2022

  • Newspapers and Schooling

    Open Access•Christian Herzog, Peter Kelly et al.•European Education•2025

  • Comparing Media Systems

    Open Access•Daniel C Hallin, P Mancini•Comparing Media Systems•2004

  • Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism

    Open Access•Ronald Inglehart, P Norris•SSRN Electronic Journal•2016

  • The ‘Washminster’ mutation

    Elaine Thompson•Politics•1980

  • The Australian's Media Supplement

    Open Access•Andrew Dodd, Matthew Ricketson•Media International Australia•2015

Unique citing works6
Citations per year1,2
Citation span2021 - 2025 (5)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae