Competing norms and shifting saliences. How norm beliefs affected behavior among Dutch health care interns during the Covid-19 lockdown
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5722278 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas Teekens (0000-0001-7727-5502, University of Groningen, The Netherlands, corresponding author), Francesca Giardini (0000-0001-7512-0048, University of Groningen, The Netherlands), Rafael Wittek (0000-0002-8473-6984, University of Groningen, The Netherlands) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 201-229 |
| Publication date | 2025-05-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Rationality and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1043-4631 • E-ISSN: 1461-7358 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/10434631251315324 |
| OpenAlex | W4406491481 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 54 |
A social norm clearly pre- or proscribes which kind of behavior is appropriate in a given situation. However, there are situations in which two competing norms apply, meaning that two opposing types of behavior are potentially legitimate. This study examines such a scenario among health care students during the initial COVID-19 lockdown in the Netherlands in 2020. The students faced two potentially competing norms, choosing between continuing to work in their internships, or to stay at home. Drawing on Goal-Framing Theory, we explore how the salience of norms may vary in four conditions of personal beliefs: sociality, normativity, conjointness, and interdependence. We argue perceived sociality and normativity serve as cues of the appropriate norm in a situation, which can be supported by beliefs about interdependence with others. The salience of disjoint norms, where the beneficiaries of normative behavior differ from those performing the behavior, is theorized to be more brittle than the salience of conjoint norms. Empirically, we surveyed 55 interns about their social norm perceptions, and employed Qualitative Comparative Analysis to uncover patterns in beliefs that lead to normative outcomes. The pathways to work continuation indicate the importance of normative beliefs in strengthening disjoint norms, combined with strong interdependence perceptions. The pathways to staying at home show how conjoint norms require less support, and that perceived normative ambivalence also favors the conjoint norm. Altogether, these results show the importance of assessing the varieties of beliefs underlying norms in situations of competing norms
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Economics · Health care · Political science · Sociology · COVID-19 and Mental Health · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Employment and Welfare Studies · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology · Virology
Groups, Sociology of
The Grammar of Society
Social norms and human cooperation
Congruent or conflicted? The impact of injunctive and descriptive norms on environmental intentions
Social Influence and Group Identity
Social norms, social identities and the Covid‐19 pandemic
The Evolution of Social Norms
Configurational Comparative Methods
Conflicting contraceptive norms for men
Essential workers and wage inequality
Shaping resilience
Competing gender norms and social practice in Himalayan farm management
Social Rationality, Semi-Modularity and Goal-Framing
What’s in a frame? Goal framing, trust and reciprocity
Normative, Gain and Hedonic Goal Frames Guiding Environmental Behavior
The concept and coverage of institution
The influence of group membership on online expressions and polarization on a discussion platform
Do the right thing
Morality and Prosocial Behavior
An Analysis of Conflicting Social Norms
Normative foundations of human cooperation
Evaluator perceptions of NGO performance in disasters
Foundations of Social Theory
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |