Fiduciary Colonialism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5734086 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Emilie Connolly (0000-0001-7146-3828, Assistant Professor, Brandeis University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 127 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 223-253 |
| Publication date | 2022-04-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The American Historical Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-8762 • E-ISSN: 1937-5239 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ahr/rhac012 |
| OpenAlex | W4213308595 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
Federal officials in the early United States built an empire by purchase. But rather than hand over lump sums for Native lands, officials offered annual payments, or annuities. This article traces annuities' material evolution from payments in goods to high-powered money-especially specie-and their financial evolution from straightforward congressional outlays to interest accrued on investments held in trust. Annuities originated as devices that could permit territorial expansion within considerable military-fiscal constraints. But once in use, they became potent instruments of federal power, shoring up officials' capacity to intrude on Native economies, wrench further territorial transfers, and channel Indigenous wealth as capital for the very infrastructural projects that spread US settlement. Overall, annuities and the trust funds into which they evolved anchored a strategy of dispossession I call fiduciary colonialism: a mode of territorial acquisition and population management carried out through the expansion of administrative control over Native peoples' wealth. In the face of federal claims to financial superiority, Indigenous peoples did not wither into wardship. Rather, they engaged trusteeship with their own futures in mind, applying annuities and trusts toward social institutions that would allow their nations to survive the ordeal of dispossession
Business · Capital (architecture) · Colonialism · Economics · Fiduciary · Indigenous · Market economy · Payment · Political science · Population · Settlement (finance) · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Finance · Law
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |