Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Has the Roberts Court Helped Donald Trump and the GOP Rig Elections and Erode American Democracy

Bibliographic Data

ID5741511
AuthorsTerri Peretti (corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume713
Issue1
Pages141-164
Publication date2024-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-7162 • E-ISSN: 1552-3349
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/00027162251335138
OpenAlexW4411297904
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited24

Over the past half century, Republican leaders have had considerable success enlisting courts in their campaign to boost the party's electoral prospects through the suppression of voting and the manipulation of election rules. Donald Trump has embraced this mission and escalated the assault on America's electoral processes in new and dangerous ways. Has the Supreme Court supported or opposed this contemptible project? Its recent election law decisions offer a mixed verdict, though its performance mostly leans in an antidemocratic direction. The court's decisions safeguarding democracy are fewer than those that undermine voting rights and elections, are typically handed down over the objections of Trump's appointees, and often include doctrinal provisions that enable it to restrict democratic participation in the future. Whether the Supreme Court will abet or discourage the erosion of American democracy in the future is an open question

Aeronautics · Democracy · Political science · Politics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Engineering · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Rights, and Freedoms

  • Donald Trump, Legal Realist

    Open Access•Adam Liptak•The Annals of the American…•2024

  • Elbridge Gerry's Salamander

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, Jonathan Ned Katz•Elbridge Gerry's Salamander•2002

  • In Electoral Disputes, State Justices Are Less Reliable GOP Allies than the U.S. Supreme Court—That’s the “Problem” the Independent State Legislature Claim Hopes to Solve

    Open Access•Rebecca L Brown, Lee Epstein et al.•The Annals of the American…•2023

  • Is the US Supreme Court a reliable backstop for an overreaching US president? Maybe, but is an overreaching (partisan) court worse

    Open Access•Rebecca L Brown, Lee Epstein•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2023

  • The U.S. Supreme Court’s Legitimacy

    Open Access•James L Gibson•The Annals of the American…•2024

  • The U.S. Supreme Court and democratic backsliding

    Open Access•Thomas M Keck•Law & Policy•2024

  • Is the American Public Really Turning Away from Democracy? Backsliding and the Conceptual Challenges of Understanding Public Attitudes

    Open Access•Amel Ahmed•Perspectives on Politics•2023

  • From the rotting soil grows the poison ivy

    Open Access•Julie Novkov•Law & Policy•2024

  • The Supreme Court

    Open Access•Charles M Cameron, Jonathan P Kastellec•The Annals of the American…•2024

  • Donald Trump, Legal Realist

    Open Access•Adam Liptak•The Annals of the American…•2024

  • American Democracy and Voter Suppression

    Open Access•Luis Ricardo Fraga, Renya Ramirez et al.•The Annals of the American…•2023

  • Laboratories of Democratic Backsliding

    Open Access•Jacob M Grumbach•American Political Science Review•2023

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae