Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The paradox of communication

Socio-cognitive approach to pragmatics

Bibliographic Data

ID5767280
AuthorsIstvan Kecskes (0000-0003-4235-2234, University at Albany, State University of New York, corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume1
Issue1
Pages50-73
Publication date2010-08-13
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePragmatics and Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1878-9714 • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/ps.1.1.04kec
OpenAlexW2010665141
LanguageEN
Citations received70

Communication is not as smooth a process as current pragmatic theories depict it. In Rapaport's words "We almost always fail [...]. Yet we almost always nearly succeed: This is the paradox of communication" (Rapaport 2003: 402). This paper claims that there is a need for an approach that is able to explain this "bumpy road" by analyzing both the positive and negative features of the communicative process. The paper presents a socio-cognitive approach (SCA) to pragmatics that takes into account both the societal and individual factors including cooperation and egocentrism that, as claimed here, are not antagonistic phenomena in interaction. This approach is considered an alternative to current theories of pragmatics that do not give an adequate account of what really happens in the communicative process. They consider communication an idealistic, cooperation-based, context-dependent process in which speakers are supposed to carefully construct their utterances for the hearer taking into account all contextual factors and hearers do their best to figure out the intentions of the speakers. This approach relies mainly on the positive features of communication including cooperation, rapport and politeness while almost completely ignores the untidy, trial-and-error nature of communication and the importance of prior contexts captured in the individual use of linguistic units. The overemphasis on cooperative, societal, contextual factors has led to disregard individual factors such as egocentrism and salience that are as important contributors to the communicative process as cooperation, context and rapport. The socio-cognitive approach is presented as a theoretical framework to incorporate and reconcile two seemingly antagonistic sides of the communicative process and explain the dynamic interplay of prior and actual situational contexts

Contextualism · Egocentrism · Salience (neuroscience · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · linguistics and terminology studies

  • Intercultural and interlanguage pragmatic adaptation in progress

    Open Access•Xueting Ban•Intercultural Pragmatics•2026

  • Pragmatics and Cognition

    Open Access•Victoria Escandell-Vidal, Victoria Escandell‐vidal•Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics•2012

  • Speech Act Theory

    Open Access•Stavros Assimakopoulo, Stavros Assimakopoulos•Speech Act Theory•2026

  • The risks of misunderstandings in family discourse

    Open Access•Arto Mustajoki, Alla Baikulova•Language and Dialogue•2020

  • The drama of dialogue action in distinct discourse spaces

    Open Access•Władysław Chłopicki•Language and Dialogue•2023

  • Yes (Rom. Da ). Usages and functions in L2 proficiency examinations

    Open Access•Andra Vasilescu•Language and Dialogue•2023

  • Exploring dialogue and culture

    Open Access•Răzvan Săftoiu•Language and Dialogue•2023

  • Exploring Interlanguage Pragmatics

    Lisda Nurjaleka, Frida Philiyanti et al.•East Asian Pragmatics•2025

  • Systemic functional linguistics and social cognition

    Open Access•Cláudio Márcio Do Carmo•Russian Journal of Linguistics•2026

  • Deliberate misinterpretation from the perspective of socio-cognitive pragmatics

    Open Access•Rundong Wang, Hongwei Zhan•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2023

  • U-curve, S-curve, or chaos

    Open Access•Dennis Lam•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2025

  • Idioms in intercultural communication

    Open Access•Karsten Senkbeil•International Journal of Language…•2020

  • Linguistic expressions as cultural units

    Open Access•Elke Diedrichsen•International Journal of Language…•2020

  • Reconstructing Multimodal Arguments in Advertisements

    Open Access•Fabrizio Macagno, Rosalice Pinto et al.•Argumentation•2021

  • An analytical instrument for coding and assessing argumentative dialogues in science teaching contexts

    Open Access•Marina Martins, Fabrizio Macagno•Science Education•2022

  • Situational transformations

    Jim O’driscoll, Jim O'Driscoll•Pragmatics and Society•2013

  • Why does Lee say what he says the way he says it

    Open Access•Zeng, Shu Zeng•Pragmatics and Society•2021

  • Political language gaffes and the importance of Hearer’s meaning

    Open Access•Nelly Tincheva•Pragmatics and Society•2025

  • “I never said that”

    Open Access•Chi-Hé Elder, Luna Filipovic•Pragmatics and Society•2025

  • A Pragmatics-based Appeal to Saving Face so as to Save Lives

    Open Access•Monika Kirner-Ludwig, Rana Fadhil Alsaedi•Journal of Intercultural…•2021

  • A Pragmatic analysis of emotion-triggering strategies in TED talks

    Open Access•Eva M Mestre-Mestre, María Beatriz Pérez Cabello del Alba•Círculo de lingüística aplicada a…•2022

  • Deliberate metaphors in English as a lingua franca interactions

    Yihui Pang, Lanping Li•Asian Englishes•2024

  • The ironist’s intentions

    Eleni Kapogianni•Pragmatics & Cognition•2016

  • The use of indexicals to co-construct common ground on the continuum of intra- and intercultural communicative contexts

    Open Access•Hanh Dinh•Pragmatics & Cognition•2019

  • The interplay of prior experience and actual situational context in intercultural first encounters

    Open Access•Istvan Kecskes•Pragmatics & Cognition•2019

  • Evidence and presumptions for analyzing and detecting misunderstandings

    Fabrizio Macagno•Pragmatics & Cognition•2017

  • Agency in metaphor and translation

    Open Access•Sum Wong•Metaphor and the Social World•2026

  • Cross-linguistic analysis of ‘point of no return’ idioms

    M Fatih Adıgüzel, M Fatih ADIGÜZEL et al.•Intercultural Pragmatics•2026

  • Narrative Retellings of Children with Childhood Apraxia of Speech

    Open Access•Maria Martzoukou, Anastasia Nousia et al.•SAGE Open•2024

  • Blended origo — Deixis in virtual reality

    Open Access•Karsten Senkbeil•Pragmatics Quarterly Publication…•2026

  • News discourse as a source of metaphorical creativity in political cartooning

    Open Access•Ahmed Abdel-Raheem•Language Sciences•2022

  • The role of secondary incongruities in cartoon appreciation

    Open Access•Beatriz Carbajal-Carrera, Olga Sánchez-Castro•European Journal of Humour Research•2020

  • Getting emotional or cognitive on social media? Analyzing renewable energy technologies in Instagram posts

    Open Access•Mariangela Vespa, Petra Schweizer-Ries et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2022

  • Conceptualization of first-order politeness in Russia

    Victoriya Trubnikova•Journal of Politeness Research•2023

  • Bogans, lawyers and teachers

    Roslyn Rowen, Michael Haugh•Intercultural Pragmatics•2017

  • The interactional achievement of speaker meaning

    Chi-Hé Elder, Michael Haugh•Intercultural Pragmatics•2018

  • AI, be less ‘stereotypical’

    Vittorio Tantucci, Carlotta Sparvoli•Intercultural Pragmatics•2025

  • Common ground as (inter)cultural in-betweenness in human-machine communication

    Ivana Trbojević Milošević•Intercultural Pragmatics•2025

  • On understandings of intention

    Michael Haugh•Intercultural Pragmatics•2012

  • A socio-cognitive approach to pragmatic inference

    Jiang Wang-qi•Intercultural Pragmatics•2017

  • Seeking common ground with a conversational chatbot

    Open Access•Judit Dombi, Tetyana Sydorenko et al.•Intercultural Pragmatics•2025

  • A relational account of communication on the basis of slips of the tongue

    José María Gil•Intercultural Pragmatics•2019

  • A socio-cognitive approach to mistranslation

    Gang Cheng•Intercultural Pragmatics•2025

  • Achieving mutual understanding in intercultural project partnerships

    Vladimir Žegarac, Helen Spencer-Oatey•Intercultural Pragmatics•2013

  • Evaluations of im/politeness of an intercultural apology

    Wei-Lin Melody Chang, Michael Haugh•Intercultural Pragmatics•2011

  • A socio-cognitive reinterpretation of Grice’s theory of conversation

    Yanwei Hu•Intercultural Pragmatics•2024

  • Towards an extended notion of Common Ground in aphasiology

    Roberto Graci•Intercultural Pragmatics•2023

  • The cognitive saliency of word associations of verbs of speech in English as a Lingua Franca interactions

    Yihui Pang•Intercultural Pragmatics•2020

  • The distance between illocution and perlocution

    Xiaowen Wang, Kami Ahrens et al.•Intercultural Pragmatics•2022

  • Pragmatics and mindreading

    Marco Mazzone•Intercultural Pragmatics•2015

  • Presuppositions as pragmemes

    Alessandro Capone•Intercultural Pragmatics•2020

  • Emotive misunderstanding within an extended relevance theory

    Baiyao Zuo•Intercultural Pragmatics•2018

  • Edda Weigand

    Răzvan Săftoiu•Intercultural Pragmatics•2018

  • Dialogic patterns of the oppressor-oppressed dynamic in climate change denial

    Open Access•Margaret Rasulo•Journal of Pragmatics•2022

  • Moderate versus extreme interpretations of political slogans

    Open Access•Lelia Gla•Journal of Pragmatics•2025

  • Skidding on common ground

    Open Access•Ivana Trbojević Milošević•Journal of Pragmatics•2019

  • A response to the paper “Metaphor interpretation and motivation in relevance theory” by Huaxin Huang and Xiaolong Yang

    Istvan Kecskes•Journal of Pragmatics•2013

  • Motivations and morphological variations in clipped personal names

    Open Access•José Antonio Sánchez Fajardo, Félix Rodríguez González•Lingua•2018

  • Narratives of vicarious experience in oral history interviews with craft artists

    Open Access•Jarmila Mildorf•Journal of Pragmatics•2018

  • Ignoring Qualifications as a Pragmatic Fallacy

    Open Access•Fabrizio Macagno•Languages•2022

  • Assessing relevance

    Open Access•Fabrizio Macagno•Lingua•2018

  • Intercultural Communication and our Understanding of Language

    Istvan Kecskes•Langages•2021

  • Why do we say what we say the way we say it

    Open Access•Istvan Kecskes•Journal of Pragmatics•2013

  • The pragmatics of manipulation

    Open Access•Sandrine Sorlin•Journal of Pragmatics•2017

  • Intercultural impoliteness

    Open Access•Istvan Kecskes•Journal of Pragmatics•2015

  • The role of language in interpersonal pragmatics

    Jim O’driscoll•Journal of Pragmatics•2013

  • Focus on the speaker

    Open Access•Istvan Kecskes•Journal of Pragmatics•2013

  • Common ground, cooperation, and recipient design in human-computer interactions

    Open Access•Judit Dombi, Tetyana Sydorenko et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2022

  • The impact of globalisation on politeness and impoliteness

    Open Access•Maria Sifianou•Journal of Pragmatics•2013

  • Disagreements, face and politeness

    Open Access•Maria Sifianou•Journal of Pragmatics•2012

Unique citing works70
Citations per year4,67
Citation span2011 - 2026 (16)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 69

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae