The paradox of communication
Socio-cognitive approach to pragmatics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5767280 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Istvan Kecskes (0000-0003-4235-2234, University at Albany, State University of New York, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 50-73 |
| Publication date | 2010-08-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Pragmatics and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1878-9714 • E-ISSN: 1878-9722 |
| Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1075/ps.1.1.04kec |
| OpenAlex | W2010665141 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 70 |
Communication is not as smooth a process as current pragmatic theories depict it. In Rapaport's words "We almost always fail [...]. Yet we almost always nearly succeed: This is the paradox of communication" (Rapaport 2003: 402). This paper claims that there is a need for an approach that is able to explain this "bumpy road" by analyzing both the positive and negative features of the communicative process. The paper presents a socio-cognitive approach (SCA) to pragmatics that takes into account both the societal and individual factors including cooperation and egocentrism that, as claimed here, are not antagonistic phenomena in interaction. This approach is considered an alternative to current theories of pragmatics that do not give an adequate account of what really happens in the communicative process. They consider communication an idealistic, cooperation-based, context-dependent process in which speakers are supposed to carefully construct their utterances for the hearer taking into account all contextual factors and hearers do their best to figure out the intentions of the speakers. This approach relies mainly on the positive features of communication including cooperation, rapport and politeness while almost completely ignores the untidy, trial-and-error nature of communication and the importance of prior contexts captured in the individual use of linguistic units. The overemphasis on cooperative, societal, contextual factors has led to disregard individual factors such as egocentrism and salience that are as important contributors to the communicative process as cooperation, context and rapport. The socio-cognitive approach is presented as a theoretical framework to incorporate and reconcile two seemingly antagonistic sides of the communicative process and explain the dynamic interplay of prior and actual situational contexts
Contextualism · Egocentrism · Salience (neuroscience · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · linguistics and terminology studies
Intercultural and interlanguage pragmatic adaptation in progress
Pragmatics and Cognition
Speech Act Theory
The risks of misunderstandings in family discourse
The drama of dialogue action in distinct discourse spaces
Yes (Rom. Da ). Usages and functions in L2 proficiency examinations
Exploring dialogue and culture
Exploring Interlanguage Pragmatics
Systemic functional linguistics and social cognition
Deliberate misinterpretation from the perspective of socio-cognitive pragmatics
U-curve, S-curve, or chaos
Idioms in intercultural communication
Linguistic expressions as cultural units
Reconstructing Multimodal Arguments in Advertisements
An analytical instrument for coding and assessing argumentative dialogues in science teaching contexts
Situational transformations
Why does Lee say what he says the way he says it
Political language gaffes and the importance of Hearer’s meaning
“I never said that”
A Pragmatics-based Appeal to Saving Face so as to Save Lives
A Pragmatic analysis of emotion-triggering strategies in TED talks
Deliberate metaphors in English as a lingua franca interactions
The ironist’s intentions
The use of indexicals to co-construct common ground on the continuum of intra- and intercultural communicative contexts
The interplay of prior experience and actual situational context in intercultural first encounters
Evidence and presumptions for analyzing and detecting misunderstandings
Agency in metaphor and translation
Cross-linguistic analysis of ‘point of no return’ idioms
Narrative Retellings of Children with Childhood Apraxia of Speech
Blended origo — Deixis in virtual reality
News discourse as a source of metaphorical creativity in political cartooning
The role of secondary incongruities in cartoon appreciation
Getting emotional or cognitive on social media? Analyzing renewable energy technologies in Instagram posts
Conceptualization of first-order politeness in Russia
Bogans, lawyers and teachers
The interactional achievement of speaker meaning
AI, be less ‘stereotypical’
Common ground as (inter)cultural in-betweenness in human-machine communication
On understandings of intention
A socio-cognitive approach to pragmatic inference
Seeking common ground with a conversational chatbot
A relational account of communication on the basis of slips of the tongue
A socio-cognitive approach to mistranslation
Achieving mutual understanding in intercultural project partnerships
Evaluations of im/politeness of an intercultural apology
A socio-cognitive reinterpretation of Grice’s theory of conversation
Towards an extended notion of Common Ground in aphasiology
The cognitive saliency of word associations of verbs of speech in English as a Lingua Franca interactions
The distance between illocution and perlocution
Pragmatics and mindreading
Presuppositions as pragmemes
Emotive misunderstanding within an extended relevance theory
Edda Weigand
Dialogic patterns of the oppressor-oppressed dynamic in climate change denial
Moderate versus extreme interpretations of political slogans
Skidding on common ground
A response to the paper “Metaphor interpretation and motivation in relevance theory” by Huaxin Huang and Xiaolong Yang
Motivations and morphological variations in clipped personal names
Narratives of vicarious experience in oral history interviews with craft artists
Ignoring Qualifications as a Pragmatic Fallacy
Assessing relevance
Intercultural Communication and our Understanding of Language
Why do we say what we say the way we say it
The pragmatics of manipulation
Intercultural impoliteness
The role of language in interpersonal pragmatics
Focus on the speaker
Common ground, cooperation, and recipient design in human-computer interactions
The impact of globalisation on politeness and impoliteness
Disagreements, face and politeness
| Unique citing works | 70 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4,67 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2026 (16) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 69 |