As expropriações e os quilombos no Brasil
Entraves Entre O Reconhecimento E a Titulação
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5769826 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gabriel Freitas Scaraffuni (0000-0002-9859-1122, corresponding author), Gabriel Freitas |
| Year | 2019 |
| Publication date | 2019-05-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | THESIS |
| Publisher | Universidade de São Paulo. Agência de Bibliotecas e Coleções Digitais (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.11606/d.91.2019.tde-03052019-181535 |
| OpenAlex | W2945622887 |
| Language | PT |
| References cited | 1 |
Expropriations and Quilombos (or maroons) in Brazil: obstacles between recognition and land titleBrazilian society and economy presents legacies of the colonial system and slavery, such as racism and the restriction of legal access to land to direct producers, which have not been surpassed either with Abolition or the Republic, not even with the development of capitalism and the forms that accompanied him during the twentieth century.The 1988 Constitution incorporated some of the claims that point to overcoming this legacy of oppression and inequality.Among them, Article 68 of the Transitional Constitutional Provisions Act, recognizing the remaining communities of quilombos (contemporary quilombos) and the right to property of the territories they occupied historically.However, after three decades of the approval of this constitutional right, it was found that only 6.7% of the remaining communities of quilombo received title to the land.This work has the objective of analyzing land conflicts involving the quilombos, from the category of expropriation, considering the historicity of quilombos in Brazil, besides analyzing the current framework of the recognition and titling of the remaining communities of quilombos
Capitalism · Constitution · Expropriation · Geography · Historicity (philosophy · Oppression · Political science · Politics · Racism · Brazilian Legal Issues · Law · Urban Development and Societal Issues
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |