Karl Polanyi's environmental sociology
A Primer
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5769962 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Steven R Brechin (0000-0002-3426-4624, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, corresponding author), Weston Henry Fenner (Syracuse University) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 404-413 |
| Publication date | 2017-07-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environmental Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2325-1042 • E-ISSN: 2325-1042 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/23251042.2017.1355723 |
| OpenAlex | W2740530201 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 33 |
Drawing upon The Great Transformation (1944), we outline Karl Polanyi's environmental sociology by providing a primer for emerging and other scholars with little exposure to this major work. While best known for his critique of laissez-faire/liberal economics, particularly reflecting upon the works of the Austrian School of Economics, we believe his unique and broad insights give particular grounding to environmental sociology itself. In addition to illustrating Polanyi's more well-known concepts of economic substantivism, fictitious commodities and the double movement, we highlight Polanyi's deeper argument for morality in society-environmental affairs. Polanyi offers a critique of the market that is not Marxian. Rather, he focuses explicitly on the unnaturalness and immorality of an economy that does not place the needs of full society and the environment at its centre. Hence, Polanyi does not reflect on the growth or the eventual collapse of capitalism, but rather the importance of an activist government and alternative forms of organizing that protects people, society and the environment. We include a brief discussion on how the current US politics and the Trump Administration's actions illustrate some of Polanyi's insights. We also apply Polanyian thinking to current research on the new sharing economy, connecting it with a theoretical foundation. To conclude, we present new lines of inquiry for environmental sociologists to consider
Argument (complex analysis · Embeddedness · Environmental sociology · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Risk Perception and Management
Commons, communities and commodification
Globalizing the treadmill of production
U.S. Labor and renewable energy
The politics of resilience
Revisiting the Calculation Debate
Will Democracy Survive Climate Change
The Soils of Black Folk
Limited Attention to Climate Change in U.S. Sociology
Natural Embeddedness, Place Attachment, and Local Opposition to Developmental Projects
Breaking the Divide
Reembedding Through Reinhabitation
The Environmental State
The Environmental State Under Pressure
Environmental Values
Climate Justice and Inequality
The “New Environmental Paradigm”
Interrogating the Treadmill of Production
Durkheim on the Environment
Interrogating the Treadmill of Production
The Power of Market Fundamentalism
Environmental Justice
Blue-Green Coalitions
Global Social Movement(s) at the Crossroads
Ecological Threat and the Founding of U.S. National Environmental Movement Organizations, 1962–1998
The Value Basis of Environmental Concern
Brief History of Neoliberalism
New Trends in Measuring Environmental Attitudes
Sustainable Lifestyles and the Quest for Plenitude
Great Transformation
Lineages of Embeddedness
Challenging Global Warming as a Social Problem
Political Economy of the Environment
Environmental Sociology
Environmental and Resource Sociology
Environmentalization
Weber and the Environment
Marx's Theory of Metabolic Rift
Karl Polanyi and the writing of The Great Transformation
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,5 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2025 (8) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |