Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Norman Conquest and the Common Law

The Levellers and the Argument from Continuity

Bibliographic Data

ID5769987
AuthorsR B Seaberg (Binghamton University, corresponding author)
Year1981
Volume24
Issue4
Pages791-806
Publication date1981-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Historical Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0018246x00008207
OpenAlexW2106767490
LanguageEN
Citations received32
References cited5

Twenty-five years ago J. G. A. Pocock first argued that the Norman conquest was the rock upon which all arguments for the continuity of the common law finally came to wreck. Believe in the conquest qua conquest, and you could not believe that English law represented a continuous stream of unviolated custom or fail to see it as very much the offspring of Norman parentage. In the English revolution, the Levellers exemplified the logical necessity of Pocock's argu ment. Having seen the conquest for what it was, the group criticized the common law as none other than a Norman yoke and surrendered all appeals to history. By re-examining the Leveller use of history, this essay tests that proposition, turning it not upside down but on its side, and suggests an alternative conclusion both about the Levellers and the doctrine of continuity itself

Argument (complex analysis · CONQUEST · Proposition · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law in Society and Culture · Legal principles and applications

  • Visions of Politics

    Open Access•Quentin Skinner•Visions of Politics•2002

  • Democracy and Legal Change

    Melissa Schwartzberg•Democracy and Legal Change•2009

  • Commonwealth Principles

    Jonathan Scott•Commonwealth Principles•2009

  • The Making of English National Identity

    Open Access•Krishan Kumar•Making of English National Identity•2003

  • Foundations of Public Law

    Martin Loughlin•Foundations of Public Law•2010

  • Absolutism and royalism

    Open Access•Johann P Sommerville•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • Sovereignty and the mixed constitution

    Julian H Franklin•Jean Bodin•2017

  • Sovereignty and the mixed constitution

    Open Access•Julian H Franklin•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • Pufendorf

    Open Access•Alfred Dufour•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • Catholic resistance theory, Ultramontanism, and the royalist response, 1580—1620

    Open Access•J H M Salmon•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700

    Open Access•Mark Goldie, James H Burns•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • Christian obedience and authority, 1520–1550

    Open Access•Francis Oakley•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • Leveller democracy and the Puritan Revolution

    Open Access•David Wootton•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • Calvinism and resistance theory, 1550–1580

    Open Access•Robert M Kingdon•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • Italian political thought, 1450–1530

    Open Access•Nicolai Rubinstein•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • Transalpine humanism

    Open Access•Brendan Bradshaw•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • Winston Churchill’s Divi Britannici (1675) and Archipelagic Royalism

    Open Access•Willy Maley, Richard Stacey•Humanities•2022

  • Experiences of Defeat

    D Woolf•English Language Notes•2025

  • Restoring the Garden of Eden in England’s Green and Pleasant Land

    Ariel Hessayon•Journal for the Study of Radicalism•2009

  • Treason and the State

    Barbara Donagan, D Alan Orr•American Journal of Legal History•2004

  • Labour — Natural, property — Artificial

    Timothy Kenyon•History of European Ideas•1985

  • Hobbes and the Purely Artificial Person of the State

    Open Access•Quentin Skinner•Journal of Political Philosophy•1999

  • John Lilburne

    Open Access•Diane Parkin-Speer•Law and History Review•1983

  • The place of custom in plebeian political culture

    Andrew Wood, Andy Wood•Social History•1997

  • The cult of King Alfred the Great

    Open Access•Simon Keynes•Anglo-Saxon England•1999

  • Peers, equals, and jurors

    Open Access•Melissa Schwartzberg, Arthur Spirling•American Journal of Political…•2025

  • The Saxon Republic and Ancient Constitution in the Standing Army Controversy, 1697–1699

    Open Access•Ashley Walsh•The Historical Journal•2018

  • The Ancient Constitution and the Languages of Political Thought

    Open Access•Mark Goldie•The Historical Journal•2018

  • The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700

    J H Burns, Mark Goldie•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • The Making of Englishmen

    Open Access•Hilary Larkin, Hilary M Larkin•The Making of Englishmen•2014

  • The hunting of the Leveller

    Open Access•Jason Peacey•Historical Research•2005

  • Does the Date Still Matter

    Open Access•David Bate, David Bates•Historical Research•2005

  • Puritanism and liberty

    A S P Woodhouse, Great Britain Army•Puritanism and liberty•1951

  • A concise history of the common law

    Theodore Frank Thomas Plucknett•A concise history of the common law•1929

  • The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law

    Open Access•J G A Pocock•Ancient Constitution and the…•1987

  • The Free Anglo-Saxons

    Richard T Vann•Journal of the History of Ideas•1958

Unique citing works32
Citations per year0,74
Citation span1983 - 2025 (43)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 31

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae