Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mountains, Land, and Kin Networks

Burkes Garden, Virginia, in the 1840s and 1850s

Bibliographic Data

ID5773726
AuthorsRalph Mann (corresponding author)
Year1992
Volume58
Issue3
Pages411-411
Publication date1992-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Southern History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-4642 • E-ISSN: 2325-6893
PublisherSouthern Historical Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2307/2210162
OpenAlexW2522944128
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited1

BURKES GARDEN IS AN OVAL LIMESTONE VALLEY OF ABOUT FORTY SQUARE miles on the southeast edge of Tazewell County in mountain southwest Virginia. The highest valley in Virginia, it is completely surrounded by the unbroken wall of Garden Mountain, which contains only one natural opening, a water gap cut by Wolf Creek to the north. This natural barrier kept the Garden from being actively settled until early in the nineteenth century, although whites first explored it and entered land claims in the 1750s. The topography of Burkes Garden necessitated community cooperation and limited agricultural development. Despite its geographical isolation, the Garden was touched by the outside world, primarily in the form of county courts and officials and a thriving livestock market. A speculative market in real property divided society into the landed and the landless and enabled the members of a recognized elite to hold power over many of their tenant neighbors-despite rhetoric, then and since, about Appalachian egalitarianism. Commerce in cattle intersected neighborhood commodity exchange rooted in credit and barter. Husking bees coexisted with suits for debt, kinship obligations with competition for grazing land. The people of antebellum Burkes Garden lived partly in a traditional world imposed and protected by the mountains and partly in a modern world of courts and capitalism. Burkes Garden, then, was neither completely isolated nor structurally egalitarian. Its landless deferred to the landed and its poor to the less poor, but the differences in behavior and social power were not nearly as great as the differences in wealth and landholding might lead one to expect. Through kin and neighborhood networks, the Appalachian people maintained an egalitarian identity in a manifestly unequal society. In describing societies in which landlord-tenant relations are central, scholars often explain social dynamics in terms of patron-client

Next of kin · American Environmental and Regional History · American History and Culture

  • Current bibliography of urban history

    Open Access•Nigel Goose•Urban History•1993

  • Lessons from Appalachia in the 20th Century

    Open Access•Mary K Anglin•American Anthropologist•2002

  • Commercialism and Frontier

    Samuel Hilliard, Robert D Mitchell•The William and Mary Quarterly•1979

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,06
Citation span1993 - 2002 (10)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae