Armas no Brasil
Desarmamento, Referendo E Políticas De Descontrole
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5776925 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Joanita Nascimento Da Silva Neta (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Publication date | 2020-03-16 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | THESIS |
| Publisher | Universidade Estadual de Campinas (PUBLISHER • BR) |
| DOI | 10.47749/t/unicamp.2020.1129346 |
| OpenAlex | W4248091883 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
This is an interpretative analysis of the attempts to empty the current regulatory framework on weapons in Brazil, the Disarmament Statute (Law 10.826/2003), which made more rigid the criteria for an ordinary citizen to obtain possession, possession or practice the trade in firearms and ammunition.Its legal effects only became fully effective two years later, in 2005, when a popular referendum was held to consult citizens on whether or not to prohibit the arms trade.The result, however, was opposed to the restrictive spirit of the Statute -the significant majority of the population did not wish to see the right to buy and sell arms and ammunition curtailed.This mismatch between the legislation passed in 2003 and the popular decision of 2005 has triggered attempts to loosen the principles of the Disarmament Statute, a phenomenon that reached a climax with the election of Jair Bolsonaro to the Presidency of the Republic in 2018.This research juxtaposes the process of approving the Disarmament Statute, in which intense social mobilization brought the institutional agenda into line with that of organized society; the referendum political process, in which the armaments regulatory apparatus suffered a partial defeat; and the strong arms offensive on the presidential agenda, which have conservative pressures as a background that invoke the problem between weapons, violence, citizenship and public security
Disarmament · Offensive · Possession (linguistics · Presidency · Referendum · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance · Gun Ownership and Violence Research
| Highly cited | No |
|---|