Common in custom, uncommon in advantage

Common property, local elites, and alternative approaches to fisheries management

Datos Bibliográficos

ID5779299
AutoresAnthony Davis (St. Francis Xavier University), C Bailey (0000-0002-2804-6938, Auburn University)
Año1996
Volumen9
Número3
Páginas251-265
Fecha de publicación1996-05-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSociety & Natural Resources (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0894-1920 • E-ISSN: 1521-0723
EditorialTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/08941929609380970
OpenAlexW1971673125
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas28
Referencias citadas29

Fisheries social research has attracted increasing attention in recent debates concerning alternative approaches in the design of fisheries management systems. This essay examines case study and fisheries social research literature with a view to highlighting conceptual-analytical strengths, shortcomings, and lessons with respect to management concerns. It is argued that effective and sustainable management regimes require that central consideration be given the principles of social justice and distributional equity. Approaching these goals, in turn, requires that research and management design attend to issues such as local-level social structures, gender/ethnic relations, and the distribution of socioeconomic power and material benefits

Common property · Common-pool resource · Conceptual framework · Equity · Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies · Marine and fisheries research · Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies