Confusing cases
Forrester, Stoller, Agnes, woman
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5780342 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Julie Walsh (0000-0002-7026-9449, University of Essex, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 3-4 |
| Pages | 15-32 |
| Publication date | 2020-07-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | History of the Human Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0952-6951 • E-ISSN: 1461-720X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0952695119897875 |
| OpenAlex | W3006915362 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 16 |
This article pursues the hypothesis that there is a structural affinity between the case study as a genre of writing and the question of gendered subjectivity. With John Forrester's chapter 'Inventing Gender Identity: The Case of Agnes' as my starting point, I ask how the case of 'Agnes' continues to inform our understanding of different disciplinary approaches (sociological and psychoanalytic) to theorizing gender. I establish a conversation between distinct, psychoanalytically informed feminisms (Simone de Beauvoir, Juliet Mitchell, Judith Butler, and Denise Riley) to move from the mid-20th century to contemporary cultural debate
Discipline · Cultural History and Identity Formation · Historical Gender and Feminism Studies · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Studies in ethnomethodology
The Transgender Studies Reader
‘Am I That Name?’
Undoing Gender
Throwing the case open
Sex and Gender in Simone de Beauvoir's Second Sex
The International Journal of Psychoanalysis
Observing The Erotic Imagination
The Interpretation of Cultures
If p, then what? Thinking in cases
Harold and Agnes
History of the human sciences
The Importance of Being Agnes
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |