The Philippine presidency in Southeast Asian perspective

Imperiled and Imperious Presidents but Not Perilous Presidentialism

Dados Bibliográficos

ID5782052
AutoresMark R Thompson (0000-0002-7004-3669, City University of Hong Kong, autor correspondente)
Ano2017
Volume24
Fascículo3
Páginas325-345
Data de publicação2017-12-11
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoContemporary Politics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1356-9775 • E-ISSN: 1469-3631
EditoraTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13569775.2017.1413503
OpenAlexW2774226715
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas7
Referências citadas60

Among the neglected cases of presidential systems in Southeast Asia, the Philippines is particularly interesting as the oldest in the region and as a 'pure' case of presidentialism which provides seemingly strong evidence for its 'perilousness'. 'First wave' presidentialism theory appears to explain how competing legitimacy claims between a president and the legislature contributed to the downfall of a sitting president (Joseph E. Estrada in 2001). Yet, Philippine presidents have usually dominated other branches of government. O'Donnell's concept of 'delegative democracy' helps elucidate the hegemonic position of Philippine presidents generally and sheds light on the illiberally transgressive nature of the Marcos and Duterte presidencies in particular. When these twin perils of imperiled and imperious presidents are examined regionally, however, striking parallels are apparent in parliamentary Thailand while the Indonesian case provides a contrasting example of a relatively stable presidential system

Democracy · Economic history · Economics · Government (linguistics · Hegemony · Legislature · Legitimacy · Parallels · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Presidency · Presidential system · Sociology · Asian Studies and History · History · Law · Philippine History and Culture · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies