The Morpheme
Its Nature and Use
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5783748 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stephen R Anderson (0000-0003-4477-1635, corresponding author) |
| Editors | Matthew Baerman (0000-0002-3060-0643) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Pages | 10-34 |
| Publication date | 2015-07-30 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Oxford Handbook of Inflection (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591428.013.2 |
| OpenAlex | W4230589667 |
| ISBN | 9780199591428 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
This chapter considers the nature and history of the notion of the morpheme in linguistic analysis, and the suitability of that concept to linguistic analysis. The historical origins of the term are traced, especially as it was used in American Structuralist work, and a range of problems with the literal application of the traditional concept to actual languages sketched. The role played by a notion of morpheme in a range of recent theories is then outlined. It is argued that although the re-emergence of an interest in morphology in the 1970s brought with it an assumption that morphemes of a classical sort are the fundamental building blocks of the structure of words, the facts of actual languages argue for a rather different conception of the relation between the form and content of words from that grounded in their division into units of this sort
Literal (mathematical logic · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
Ciri Morfosemantik Afiks Derivasional {Ber-} dalam Konstruksi Verba Deajektival Bahasa Indonesia
For Never Was a Mazier Mystery Than That of Phoneme and Its History
The Typological Diversity of Morphomes
Inflection and derivation as traditional comparative concepts
Phonaesthemes in morphological theory
If everything is syntax, why are words so important? An a-morphous but non-lexicalist approach
| Citations per year | 0.55 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2015 - 2024 (10) |
| Highly cited | No |