(Post)Revolutionary Interlinkages
Labour, Environment and Accumulation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5787923 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Luis Eslava (0000-0001-7312-8986, International Law Institute), Usha Natarajan (0000-0002-7376-842X, International Law Institute), Rose Parfitt (0000-0002-1262-6823, International Law Institute) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 108-125 |
| Publication date | 2013-08-06 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Transnational Legal Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2041-4005 • E-ISSN: 2041-4013 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.5235/20414005.4.1.108 |
| OpenAlex | W3121252647 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 3 |
In this collective review, we explore Timothy Mitchells Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil with a view to reflecting critically on a contemporary historical juncture, which we call a (post)revolutionary moment. The review builds on discussions at a seminar we co-organised in Doha, Qatar under the auspices of Harvard Law Schools Institute for Global Law and Policy as part of its annual workshop in January 2013.1 Carbon Democracy is part of a significant body of scholarship stretching over several decades where Mitchell explores the relationship between economic expertise and the material conditions of socio-economic development. Mitchells analyses over the years have been wide-ranging in their interests and implications, but his particular focus has been the Arab region. In Carbon Democracy, Mitchell maintains this geographical focus, investigating the internal mechanics and political repercussions of that quintessential Middle Eastern commodity, oil. Yet this is not an ordinary resuscitation of the rentier states thesis: as Mitchell explains: [r]ather than a study of democracy and oil, [this] became a book about democracy as oilas a form of politics whose mechanisms on multiple levels involve the processes of producing and using carbon energy (5).2
| Citations per year | 0.17 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2014 - 2018 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |