Gesture, Interjection and Onomatopoeia in Edward Burnett Tylor's Theory of the Origin and Development of Language

Bibliographic Data

ID5802846
AuthorsRoberta P Mocerino (Ministry of Education, Universities and Research, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume13
Pages71-71
Publication date2016-12-19
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTheoria et Historia Scientiarum (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0867-4159 • E-ISSN: 2392-1196
PublisherUniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika/Nicolaus Copernicus University (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.12775/ths.2016.005
OpenAlexW2577458451
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited9

In this paper, I shall focus on E. B. Tylor's theory on the origin and development of language, as it is expounded in his Researches into the Early History of Mankind (1865), in Primitive Culture (1871) and in Anthropology (1881). In his first work, influenced by Charles Darwin and Max Müller, he tried to explain the emergence of human language from what he called "Gesture-Language". This line of inquiry prompted him to discuss the relation between objects and names, which in turn led him to the conclusion that primitive minds cannot separate "objects" from "ideas". This idea stands at the core of his most famous theory, that is, "Primitive Animism". Tylor's theory of "Gesture-Language" was in contrast with Müller's idea of language as the "Rubicon" that separates Men from Animals. This opposition is analysed in Primitive Culture and Anthropology, where Tylor explicitly discusses of interjectional and imitative theories

Animism · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access