Slavery and Technological Change
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5808451 |
|---|---|
| Authors | R Keith Aufhauser (Queens College, CUNY, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1974 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 36-50 |
| Publication date | 1974-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Economic History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-0507 • E-ISSN: 1471-6372 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0022050700079614 |
| OpenAlex | W2142288311 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 10 |
Much of the confusion in the debate on slavery and technology derives from the belief that identifies technological change with progress. Not only the Awkwrights and Seniors thought this way; Marx and, from what I have heard from my colleagues at this conference, a fair proportion of economic historians maintain that the salvation of society depends upon changes in the techniques of production
Confusion · Economics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Macroeconomics · Microeconomics · Neoclassical economics · Political science · Positive economics · Production (economics · Psychoanalysis · Technological change · Colonialism, slavery, and trade · Global Maritime and Colonial Histories · Philosophy · Psychology
Slavery in the Circuit of Sugar, Second Edition
Changing sugar technology and the labour nexus
Plantation Factories
Slave Labour and Production
Realising Production – The Tools of Empire
Brazilian Abolition in Comparative Perspective (1988)
Emancipation and labour on Jamaican coffee plantations, 1838–48
Overcoming Discrimination by Consumers during the Age of Segregation
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,22 |
| Citation span | 1989 - 2022 (34) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |