Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Remarks on the Role of the Perfect Participle in Italian Morphology and on its History

Bibliographic Data

ID5810164
AuthorsAndrea Calabrese (0000-0001-7441-9275, University of Connecticut, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume32
Issue2
Pages209-269
Publication date2020-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueProbus (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0921-4771 • E-ISSN: 1613-4079
PublisherDe Gruyter (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/probus-2020-0006
OpenAlexW3093629967
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited50

Since (Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press), the disparate morphosyntactic roles that past participle forms have in Latin (and Italian) morphology have played a central role in arguing for morphomic approaches. In this article, I will propose an alternative analysis of the special behavior of these participle forms in Distributed Morphology (DM, Halle Morris, & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger , 111-176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.). In particular, I will propose that morphological spell-out, as a first stage of the PF derivation, includes morphological repairs triggered by abstract "morphomic" constraints. These repairs can insert "ornamental" pieces - structures that are not motivated syntactically or semantically but only morphologically - to mediate the interface between abstract syntactico-semantic structures and surface PF construction. I will demonstrate the role that these repairs play in accounting for the surface convergence between perfect and passive participle forms, and adjectival stative ones, and for the appearance of past participles in nominalizations. The article ends with an analysis of Latin past participle morphology focusing on its historical development. The first part of this analysis deals with the development of Latin verbal structure from Proto-Indo-European (PIE) and in particular with the development of "ornamental" thematic vowels. It then turns to a brief investigation of the historical development of the Latin past participle exponent /- t -/ from PIE adjectival suffix *-tó-, and of the PIE agentive and action/result nominal suffixes *-tér/tor, *-ti-, *-tu, *-men-(to)-. This will lead to a discussion of Latin nominalizations, the supine and the future participle and a possible explanation of why they contain participial morphology

Inflection · Morphology · Participle · Word formation · Linguistics and language evolution · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • To v or not to v ? Theme vowels, verbalizers, and the structure of the Ancient Greek verb

    Open Access•Laura Grestenberger•Glossa a journal of general…•2022

  • Latin verbal morphology and the diachronic development of its thematic and athematic constructions

    Andrea Calabrese•Probus•2023

  • Deriving Latin Ablative Absolute

    Open Access•Jarosław Jakielaszek•Studia Linguistica•2025

  • What learning Latin verbal morphology tells us about morphological theory

    Open Access•Jordan Kodner•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2023

  • Athematic verbal forms in Italian

    Open Access•Natascha Pomino, Eva-Maria Remberger•Linguistic Variation•2025

  • A History of English

    Donald A Ringe, Donald Ringe•From Proto-Indo-European to…•2006

  • Inner Aspect

    Open Access•Lisa deMena Travis•Inner Aspect•2010

  • Adverbs and Functional Heads

    Guglielmo Cinque•Adverbs and functional heads•1999

  • Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology

    David Embick•Localism versus globalism in…•2010

  • Morphotactics

    Open Access•Karlos Arregi, Andrew Nevins•Morphotactics•2012

  • Where’s Phi? Agreement as a Postsyntactic Operation

    Jonathan David Bobaljik•Phi-Theory•2008

  • Severing the External Argument from its Verb

    Angelika Kratzer•Phrase Structure and the Lexicon•1996

  • Actionality, tense, and viewpoint

    Gerd V M Haverling•Constituent Syntax•2010

  • New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin

    Andrew L Sihler•New comparative grammar of Greek…•1995

  • Morphomes

    Martin Maiden•Oxford Guide to the Romance…•2016

  • Lectures on Government and Binding

    Noam Chomsky•Lectures on Government and Binding•1993

  • Functional Structure in Nominals

    Artemis Alexiadou•Functional Structure in Nominals•2001

  • Die mit dem Suffix -to- gebildeten Partizipia im Verbal-system des Lateinischen und des Umbrisch-Oskischen. Eine syntaktische Untersuchung.

    Karl Brugmann•Indogermanische Forschungen•1895

  • What is sent to spell-out is phases, not phasal complements

    Open Access•Zeljko Boskovic•Linguistica•2016

  • On the Status of Stems in Morphological Theory

    David Embick, Morris Halle•Romance languages and linguistic…•2005

  • Whither head movement

    Open Access•Boris Harizanov, Vera Gribanova•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2019

  • Word formation is syntactic

    Open Access•Benjamin Bruening•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2014

  • Introduction to Indo-European Linguistics

    Joseph F Eska, Oswald J L Szemerenyi•Language•2000

  • Now I’m a Phase, Now I’m Not a Phase

    Zeljko Boskovic•Linguistic Inquiry•2014

  • Multiple correspondence

    Open Access•Luigi Burzio•Lingua•1998

  • Irregular Morphology and Athematic Verbs in Italo-Romance

    Open Access•Andrea Calabrese•Isogloss Open Journal of Romance…•2015

  • Features, Syntax, and Categories in the Latin Perfect

    David Embick•Linguistic Inquiry•2000

  • Manciati siti ? Les constructions moyennes avec les participes résultatifs-statifs en italien et dans les variétés italo-romanes méridionales

    David Bentley, Delia Bentley et al.•Langages•2014

  • Aspects of the Morphophonology of the Verb in Latin and in German and English

    Morris Halle•Linguistic Inquiry•2019

  • The Ups and Downs of Head Displacement

    Karlos Arregi, Asia Pietraszko•Linguistic Inquiry•2021

  • Movement Operations after Syntax

    David Embick, Rolf Noyer•Linguistic Inquiry•2001

  • Architecture and Blocking

    David Embick, Alec Marantz•Linguistic Inquiry•2008

  • On the Structure of Resultative Participles in English

    David Embick•Linguistic Inquiry•2004

  • Stress-by-Structure in Spanish

    Isabel Oltra-Massuet, Isabel Oltra‐Massuet et al.•Linguistic Inquiry•2005

  • Latin 1st class -ā- verbs as thematic formations

    Open Access•Davide Bertocci•Pallas•2017

  • Interactions at the syntax-phonology interface

    Open Access•Heather Newell, Glyne Piggott•Lingua•2014

  • Passive and Stative in Chichewa

    Stanley Dubinsky, Silvester Ron Simango•Language•1996

Unique citing works5
Citations per year1.25
Citation span2022 - 2025 (4)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae