A World of Passions
How to Think About Globalization Now
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5822115 |
|---|---|
| Authors | P Sc Urdy Sc (Indiana University, corresponding author), P urdy P urdy |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 1-1 |
| Publication date | 2004-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1080-0727 • E-ISSN: 1543-0367 |
| Publisher | Indiana University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2979/gls.2004.11.2.1 |
| OpenAlex | W1970917013 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 6 |
Recent events have been unkind to a doctrine that defined global economics and politics during the 1 9 9 0s.That doctrine, often termed "neo-liberalism" or "the Washington Consensus," was defined by the belief that free markets and international economic integration would lead the world toward prosperity, liberal democracy, and peace.The failure of neo-liberal development policies in countries such as Indonesia and Argentina, and the new prominence of elite and popular nationalism and fundamentalism whose most vivid expression is terrorism, have together shown the insufficiency of the neo-liberal program.In Part I of this essay, I present the major features of neo-liberalism, as a program and as a view of development, and argue that it embodied a distinctly optimistic and rationalist theory of modernity. 1After sketching the events that led to the decline of neo
| Citations per year | 0.05 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2005 - 2005 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |