Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

All the Way Through

Testing for Authorship in Different Frequency Strata

Bibliographic Data

ID5827281
AuthorsJ F Burrows (University of Newcastle Australia, corresponding author), J Burrows
Year2006
Volume22
Issue1
Pages27-47
Publication date2006-01-06
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueLiterary and Linguistic Computing (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0268-1145 • E-ISSN: 1477-4615
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/llc/fqi067
OpenAlexW2014864037
LanguageEN
Citations received17
References cited5

This article describes the operation of two new tests of authorship and offers some results. Both tests rely on controlled contrasts of word-frequency and both exclude the very common words, which have been put to such good use in recent years. One test treats of words used with some consistency by a target-author but more sporadically by others. The second treats of words used sporadically by the target-author but not by most others. (The inclusion of words that some other authors use avoids the strict constraint that has impoverished this form of evidence.) In suitable cases, both tests prove very accurate. The fact that evidence of authorship can be detected in these three distinct frequency-strata helps to explain why such tests should work at all and so encourages the development of even better ones

Authorship Attribution and Profiling

  • Quantitative Analysis and Literary Studies

    Open Access•David L Hoover•A Companion to Digital Literary…•2013

  • Authorship and Stylistics

    Open Access•David L Hoover•Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics•2015

  • Novelas originales y americanas

    Open Access•Ulrike Henny-Krahmer•apropos [Perspektiven auf die…•2022

  • Individuação de autoria e identificação de estilo

    Open Access•Luis Felipe Lima E Silva, Larissa Santos Ciríaco•Fórum Linguístico•2022

  • Craig, Hugh, director. Craig’s Zeta test. Other

    Open Access•R L N Barber, Ros Barber•Renaissance and Reformation•2022

  • From Keyness to Distinctiveness – Triangulation and Evaluation in Computational Literary Studies

    Julian Schröter, Keli Du et al.•Journal of Literary Theory•2021

  • A style for every age

    Open Access•Wouter Haverals, Lindsey Geybels et al.•Language and Literature…•2022

  • Legitimation and Textual Evidence

    Open Access•Calvin Pollak•Written Communication•2021

  • Atticism

    Open Access•Eleni Bozia•Open Linguistics•2016

  • Did John Stuart Mill Write ‘On Social Freedom’

    Open Access•Antis Loizides, Andreas Neocleous et al.•Humanities•2023

  • EvoText

    Open Access•Grant Ramsey, Charles H Pence•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2016

  • Concepts in Contexts

    Alvin Cheng‐Hsien Chen, Táňa Dluhošová•Asian Studies Review•2022

  • Prime Suspect

    David L Kennedy, David Kennedy et al.•Palestine Exploration Quarterly•2016

  • The Authorship of the Disputed Federalist Papers with an Annotated Corpus

    Antonio Miranda-García, Javier Calle Martín et al.•English Studies•2012

  • The Tutor's Story

    David L Hoover•English Studies•2012

  • Defining digital humanities and examining its relationship with linguistics through the lens of Digital Scholarship in the Humanities

    Open Access•Jianwei Yan, Qidi Li et al.•Digital Scholarship in the…•2025

  • Theater as Data

    Open Access•Miguel Escobar Varela•Theater As Data•2020

Citations per year1.21
Citation span2012 - 2025 (14)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae