De la Afinidad Electiva entre la Teoría Sociológica de Luhmann y la Antropología Filosófica Alemana
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5827427 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Patricio Miranda (0000-0002-8270-1112, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Issue | 50 |
| Pages | 80-92 |
| Publication date | 2014-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cinta de moebio (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0717-554X • E-ISSN: 0717-554X |
| Publisher | SciELO Agencia Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo (ANID) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4067/s0717-554x2014000200004 |
| OpenAlex | W2137507881 |
| SciELO | S0717-554X2014000200004 |
| Language | ES |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 4 |
The article argues for the existence of an elective affinity between the systems theory of Niklas Luhmann and German philosophical anthropology, affinity that would bring to light (a-letheia) a 'blind spot' of the functionalism of the equivalence that is placed in the antithesis of the so called anti humanism in Luhmann.The question asked by the German sociologist: which self-projection of man is behind the assumptions of functionalist thinking?He responded: the man as problem solver in a transcendental sense.As well as in Goethe elective affinity of a 'new' theoretical content with pre-existing materials, in the case that concerns us, such pre-existing materials would have had a known address, so that the originality of Luhmann would be in a new composition of categories.The new luhmannian composition takes shape, at least in the following arguments: the distinction from man/environment to the distinction system/environment; the turn from contingency to double contingency; complexity and its reduction in German philosophy to complexity and its reduction in systems theory; from categories of self-reference and self-observation to the theory of the observer; the offset of the human and the world to the offset of society; the functionalism of the German philosophy to the functionalism of the equivalence
| Citations per year | 0.13 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2018 - 2018 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |