Privacy and Power
Computer Databases and Metaphors for Information Privacy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5827769 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel J Solove (0000-0001-6598-482X, Yale University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 1393-1393 |
| Publication date | 2001-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Stanford Law Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0038-9765 • E-ISSN: 1939-8581 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1229546 |
| OpenAlex | W3123535767 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 24 |
| References cited | 1 |
Journalists, politicians, jurists, and legal academics often describe the privacy problem created by the collection and use of personal information through computer databases and the Internet with the metaphor of Big Brotherthe totalitarian government portrayed in George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four.Professor Solove argues that this is the wrong metaphor.The Big Brother metaphor as well as much of the law that protects privacy emerges from a longstanding paradigm for conceptualizing privacy problems.Under this paradigm, privacy is invaded by uncovering one's hidden world, by surveillance, and by the disclosure of concealed information.The harm caused by such invasions consists of inhibition, self-censorship, embarrassment, and damage to one's reputation.Privacy law has developed with this paradigm in mind, and consequently, it has failed to grapple effectively with the database problem.Professor Solove argues that the Big Brother metaphor merely reinforces this paradigm and that the problem is better captured by Franz Kafka's The Trial.Understood with the Kafka metaphor, the problem is the powerlessness, vulnerability, and dehumanization created by the assembly of dossiers of personal information where individuals lack any meaningful form of participation in the collection and use of their information.Professor Solove illustrates that conceptualizing the problem with the Kafka metaphor has profound implications both for the law of information privacy and for choosing legal approaches to solve the problem
Privacy Protection · Privacy software · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting · Law, Rights, and Freedoms · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Own Data? Ethical Reflections on Data Ownership
The Knowing of Literature
Revisiting the Relationship between Privacy and Data Protection
Digital Data Collection and Information Privacy Law
Forewords ∙ Why Privacy and Domination?
From Monsters to Mazes
A new social contract for technology
The EU Model of Digital Trust
Situating Privacy Online
Is explainable artificial intelligence intrinsically valuable
Code Word Cloud in Franz Kafka’s “Beim Bau der Chinesischen Mauer” [“The Great Wall of China”]
Privacy and the Commercial Use of Personal Information
Reloading Data Protection
The Internet is Not a Super Highway
Student Vulnerability, Agency and Learning Analytics
Biometric citizenship and the digital transformation policy agenda in Latin America
Read at your own risk
The (in)visible barriers to free software
Procedural fairness in algorithmic decision-making
Framing Resistance Against Surveillance
The two facets of electronic care surveillance
The Aadhaar debate
Markers of Online Privacy Marginalization
Registry, Print, Resistance
| Unique citing works | 24 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2002 - 2026 (25) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 22 |