A postcolonial framing of Indian commercial surrogacy
Issues, Representations, and Orientalisms
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5829864 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lisa Lau (0000-0001-7295-336X, Keele University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 666-685 |
| Publication date | 2018-05-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Gender Place & Culture (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0966-369X • E-ISSN: 1360-0524 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0966369x.2018.1471047 |
| OpenAlex | W2803460502 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 22 |
Although only legalised in 2002, Indian commercial gestational surrogacy (CGS) is an industry worth an estimated 2.3 billion USD to India at its height. Not only has this contentious topic been researched extensively from a spectrum of academic angles, representations of Indian CGS abound in both the Indian and Western popular media (novels, documentaries, films, etc.), and increasingly online, particularly in CGS websites, advertisements, and (personal) blogs. Popular media representations as well as commercial ones can often be inclined towards the sentimental and even sanctimonious, but are immensely influential in shaping public perception. This article seeks to position the discourse and representation of transnational Indian CGS more explicitly within the postcolonial framework. Thus, it addresses a theoretical gap in explicitly connecting the problematic issues of power and ethics in CGS within the paradigms of postcolonial studies, drawing also on gender and feminist frameworks. The neo-colonisation of the body has been already considered to some extent - mostly in neo-liberalist contexts - but the industry's systemically orientalistic set up and structure has been surprisingly little mentioned, particularly where transnational surrogacy is involved, with little framing of the imperialistic hangovers and undertones dogging these particular sets of international contracts. This article maps the orientalisms (and sometimes re-orientalisms) at play in this already fraught and contentious context, positioning transnational surrogacy as another instance of imperialism, as yet another form of cultural colonisation, othering, subalternising, and peripheralising working-class Indian surrogate women in the twenty-first century
Framing (construction · Reality television · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Marriage and Sexual Relationships · Reproductive Health and Technologies
Applying Rawls’ Theory of Public Reason to Controversies over Parental Surrogacy
Riots or revolution? A framing analysis of the Mahsa Amini protests in U.S. and Iranian media
Surrogacy among Filipinos who have struggled with infertility
How Progressive are Multidimensional Accounts of Autonomy? Transnational Feminist-Friendly Amendments and a Critical Intersectional Relational Autonomy
Geographies of reproductive justice
Another Reason
Discounted Life
Wombs in Labor
Feminist Genealogies, Colonial Legacies, Democratic Futures
Re-imagining Reproduction
A Womb That Is (Not Always) One's Own
Race, Nation, and the Production of Intimacy
Commercial Surrogacy in India
Words, Ideas and Ideology in the Shifting Sand of Markets
Marketing Reproduction
Reconceiving Surrogacy
I only need her uterus”
I am the baby's real mother”
Speaking of Solidarity
Encountering Development
Altruistic Agencies and Compassionate Consumers
Gendered Geographies of Reproductive Tourism
Relations of difference
Global reproductive inequalities, neo-eugenics and commercial surrogacy in India
Experimental Sociality and Gestational Surrogacy in the Indian ART Clinic
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |