Was Traditional Chinese Law a Mere "Model"? Part One
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5834702 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Shigeo Nakamura (0000-0002-9681-3510, Kanazawa University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 139-157 |
| Publication date | 2004-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Asian Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1479-5914 • E-ISSN: 1479-5922 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1479591404000105 |
| OpenAlex | W2058662680 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
A frequently discussed theory about the nature and function of traditional Chinese law claims that, in traditional China, law was no more than a model, with little practical applicability. This theory seems to be still dominant. On a different occasion in the past, I presented some doubts about this theory of law as a "model", based on impressions I received from reading through a body of judgments from Qing dynasty lawsuits
Chinese history and philosophy · Legal principles and applications
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,22 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2022 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |