On the Promise of a Sociological Aesthetics

From Georg Simmel to Michel Maffesoli

Bibliographic Data

ID5836712
AuthorsEduardo De La Fuente (0000-0002-9129-4969, Monash University, corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume8
Issue2
Pages91-110
Publication date2007-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueDistinktion Journal of Social Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1600-910X • E-ISSN: 2159-9149
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/1600910x.2007.9672948
OpenAlexW1538022707
LanguageEN
Citations received16
References cited26

This article outlines the contribution of a sociological aesthetics to explaining social life. The central argument is that aesthetic phenomena are neither incidental nor epiphenomenal to social structure; rather the social bond itself possesses an aesthetic dimension. The two central thinkers discussed are Georg Simmel and Michel Maffesoli. The first pioneered a sociology grounded in aesthetics through the study of forms of sociation where, as social interaction becomes more fully autonomous, the aesthetic attraction of doing things together starts to dominate. The second emphasizes what social actors feel they have in common when they share tastes, customs or habits. He terms this an 'ethics of aesthetics' and asks whether it is becoming the dominant form of collective bonding. Synthesizing these insights, the article concludes by advocating that the full potential of a sociological aesthetics is realized only when: (i)careful attention is paid to the specific character of aesthetic forms of integration; (2) aesthetic and non-aesthetic forms of sociation are clearly differentiated; and (3) socio-aesthetic analysis avoids vague 'culturalogical' generalizations

Argument (complex analysis · Everyday Aesthetics · Social life · Sociological theory · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Management and Organizational Studies · Social and Cultural Dynamics

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub