Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Vulnerabilidade como critério legítimo de desequiparação no processo civil

Bibliographic Data

ID5839319
AuthorsFernanda Tartuce Silva (corresponding author)
Year2011
Publication date2011-03-29
Open AccessYes
TypeTHESIS
PublisherUniversidade de São Paulo. Agência de Bibliotecas e Coleções Digitais (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.11606/t.2.2011.tde-16082012-143743
OpenAlexW1594763571
LanguagePT
References cited4

Isonomy has been dealt with from its evolution in human thoughts and in the inequality of social context in Latin American and Brazilian realities since their colonial times.After the discourse analysis regarding handling equal ones equally and unequal ones unequally, the State constitutional commitment in promoting equality in its connection to other constitutional guarantees is addressed.The rereading of the object and the function of the civil process is promoted through the light of isonomy; being the magistrate's duty to guarantee it among litigants, the lead of the process is advocated in a dynamic and collaborative perspective in order to provide the effective access to justice and the real parity between the parties without compromising the judge impartiality.Once the need of a differentiated treatment is identified, the vulnerability is presented as a legitimate criterion for distinctions from consistent assessment elements.Equality is addressed under the civil process humanization and the thesis presents the innovative concept of procedural vulnerability, susceptibility, which compromises the practice of act in court by an involuntary litigant limitation due to health and/or economical, informational, technical or organizational order of permanent or provisional character.Differences presented on the procedural system are analyzed in order to assess a possible link with factors related to the vulnerability.There are also proposed solutions in order to overcome harmful effects from procedural vulnerability in several moments of the processing of civil works and to foster an equal participation.Finally, the application viability of the thesis is demonstrated through the claim of cause, indicating the procedural aspects for its recognition in court

Business · Computer security · Duty · Economic Justice · Geography · Human rights · Impartiality · Magistrate · Political science · Right to health · Sociology · Vulnerability · Brazilian Legal Issues · Computer Science · Law · Legal Issues in South Africa

  • Direito constitucional

    Antonio De Sampaio Dória•Direito constitucional•1953

  • Cidadania no Brasil

    Open Access•Regina Célia Diniz Werner•Revista de Administração…•2005

  • O formalismo-valorativo no confronto com o formalismo excessivo

    Open Access•Carlos Alberto Alvaro de Oliveira•Revista da Faculdade de Direito•2017

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae