Racionalidades e invenções andinas nos conflitos de luta pela posse da terra em regiões tropicais da Bolívia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5839711 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Wilbert Villca Lopez (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Publication date | 2017-01-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | THESIS |
| Publisher | Universidade de São Paulo. Agência de Bibliotecas e Coleções Digitais (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.11606/d.84.2017.tde-24012017-131227 |
| OpenAlex | W2582017893 |
| Language | PT |
| References cited | 3 |
This research deals with the collective action of migrant Bolivian indigenous farmers in conflicts over land, in the dense regions of modernizing advancement of eastern Bolivia called agriculture.The adverse and asymmetric opportunities in access to land motivate constant production of struggles, combining with union, indigenous, and MSTi-like forms, while occupying public land intended for farmer and rancher use.Because these subjects are mostly quechua, they aim for Andean perspectives of production and Andean views on mobilization, as well as contributing with their actions to national change projects, both in the Bolivian state crisis (from 2000 to 2005) as well as in the formation of the Plurinational State of Bolivia (from 2006 to 2010).Regarding matters of land ownership, it is offered documentation of the second half of the twentieth century, when the peasantry becomes a powerful economic and political force.These political agents fight against the repressive forces, when they opt for illegal occupations, and recede in other times, opting to coexist with their contenders and with rules and procedures offered from the top down.This study focuses less on structures and more on mobilized individuals, their interactions, their emotions, everyday consensus and dissent of the so-called avasalladores, land invaders, who produce their own rationality of struggle.This study analyses thee statements produced in Quechua by the protagonists of the conflict, grassroots leaders' narratives, interviews with former State employees, texts written by intellectuals, etc.Also, handwritten documents made by the mobilized groups; police and prosecutors' files; national newspapers; demands written by organizations; and information from the files of the INC and the INRA, both agricultural entities.This research is supported by ethnographic field observations and the ressearcher's trajectory with the issue
Agriculture · Archaeology · Collective action · Customary land · Dissent · Geography · Grassroots · Indigenous · Land tenure · Narrative · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Indigenous Cultures and History · Indigenous Studies in Latin America · Law
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |