Design
Modos de [des]uso. Aproximações contemporâneas entre arte e design
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5841411 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marilia Solfa (0000-0001-5364-8108, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Publication date | 2017-09-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | THESIS |
| Publisher | Universidade de São Paulo. Agência de Bibliotecas e Coleções Digitais (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.11606/t.102.2017.tde-04092017-121048 |
| OpenAlex | W2754601663 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 10 |
This thesis proposes a study on the renewed interest of contemporary art in rescuing and re-shaping the modern discussion regarding the relationship between art and design.This approach differs from the previous modernist proposal, as it responds to the singular cultural, social and economic context in which it is developed.Therefore, our aim is to characterize and understand both this new context and the main issues concerning this rapprochement between art and design by analysing the production of four important artists in the contemporary scene: Vito Acconci (1940), Barbara Bloom (1951) Andrea Zittel (1965) and Ana Maria Tavares (1958).This research addresses the tactics of artistic intervention within the design discourse field which, in the society governed by advanced capitalism, constitutes one of the main systems of production and consumption of images, signs, objects, environments and individual and collective identities.By going through a process of expansion and diffusion, spreading and infiltrating into various spheres of everyday life, the field of design becomes a starting point for the production of artists who, through disruptive action tactics, seek opportunities, even if temporary, to intervene in a world increasingly designed and planned to the very last detail
Aesthetics · Art · Capitalism · Consumption · Everyday life · Humanities · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Art, Politics, and Modernism · Diverse academic and cultural studies · History · Urban and sociocultural dynamics
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |