Are Some Languages Better than Others
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5846437 |
|---|---|
| Authors | R M W Dixon (0000-0001-8294-5806), Robert Dixon (0000-0003-1836-4198, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Pages | 208 |
| Publication date | 2016-03-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Are Some Languages Better than Others? (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198766810.001.0001 |
| OpenAlex | W2418556777 |
| ISBN | 9780198766810 |
| Open Library | OL27708136M |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 52 |
This book sets out to answer a question that many linguists have been hesitant to ask: are some languages better than others? Can we say, for instance, that because German has three genders and French only two, German is a better language in this respect? Jarawara, spoken in the Amazonian jungle, has two ways of showing possession: one for a part (e.g. 'Father's foot') and the other for something which is owned and can be given away or sold (e.g. 'Father's knife'); is it thus a better language than English, which marks all possession in the same way? R. M. W. Dixon begins by outlining what he feels are the essential components of any language, such as the ability to pose questions, command actions, and provide statements. He then discusses desirable features including gender agreement, tenses, and articles, before concluding with his view of what the ideal language would look like - and an explanation of why it does not and probably never will exist. Written in the author's usual accessible and engaging style, and full of personal anecdotes and unusual linguistic phenomena, the book will be of interest to all general language enthusiasts as well as to a linguistics student audience, and particularly to anyone with an interest in linguistic typology
Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Comparative and general Grammar · Comparative linguistics · Grammar, Comparative and general · Typology (linguistics)
Evidentiality and Its Relations With Other Verbal Categories
Dizque and other Emergent Evidential forms in Romance Languages
Evidentiality
Evidentiality in Nakh-Daghestanian Languages
Evidentiality in Japanese
The Interactional and Cultural Pragmatics of Evidentiality in Pastaza Quichua
Evidentiality and Language Contact
Where Do Evidentials Come From?
Evidentiality in the Languages of New Guinea
Evidentiality in Boran and Witotoan Languages
Evidentiality in Formosan Languages
Stereotypes and Evidentiality
Evidentiality and Information Source in Signed Languages
Evidentiality in Bodic Languages
Extragrammatical Expression of Information Source
Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality in Gitksan
Evidentiality in Algonquian
Evidentials and Epistemic Modality
Evidentiality and the Expression of Knowledge
Non-Propositional Evidentiality
Evidentiality in Nambikwara Languages
Evidentials, Information Sources, and Cognition
Evidentiality
Evidentials and Person
Evidentiality in Tibetic
The Reportative in the Languagesc of the Philippines
Evidentiality in Korean
Turkic Indirectivity
The Acquisition of Evidentiality
Evidentiality and Formal Semantic Theories
Evidentiality in the Uto-Aztecan Languages
Evidence and Evidentiality in Quechua Narrative Discourse
Evidentiality and the Cariban Languages
Evidentiality in Tukanoan Languages
The Cambridge Handbook of African Linguistics
African Linguistics in North-Eastern and So-Called Anglophone Africa
Discourse and social interaction
Evidentials in Uralic Languages
Evidentiality in Mongolic
Noun classes
Phonotactics
Australian languages and interdisciplinary approaches to the past
Functional Domains, Functions, and the Notion of Complexity
On Dixon’s ‘dangerous idea’
Zamucoan Person Marking as a Perturbed System
Language policies, language rights, and sign languages
Speaking about knowledge
Comparison, Contrast and Similarity in Yalaku
The Oxford Guide to Australian Languages
Some Don't Even Know Where South Is
Asymmetrical Complexity in Languages Due to L2 Effects
The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality
| Citations per year | 6.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2018 - 2024 (7) |
| Highly cited | No |