Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Race, Citizenship and 'race relations' Research in late-Twentieth-century Britain

Bibliographic Data

ID5847872
AuthorsR Waters (0000-0002-7612-2173, Queen Mary University of London, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume34
Issue3
Pages491-514
Publication date2023-05-24
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTwentieth Century British History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0955-2359 • E-ISSN: 1477-4674
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/tcbh/hwad034
PMID39446399
OpenAlexW4380090393
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited9

This article reads late-twentieth-century race relations research projects from the perspectives of the black and brown Britons who were the targets of research. The analysis focuses on contestations around issues of epistemic authority and resource allocation in the relationship between black citizens and the state in the post-war decades, helping us to understand why so many black citizens saw the state and its programmes of social research not as enabling or providing but surveilling and disempowering them. Relative to the dominant reading among historians of late-twentieth-century Britain of the rise of social research as a democratic story, in which 'ordinary' voices were listened to and given weight in the development of social policy, the study of race relations research in this article reveals a far less consensual, less democratic relationship between state-sponsored research institutions and the black and brown people who became targets of race-relations research projects. It highlights the ubiquity of challenges or evasions to those research institutions and their claims to epistemic authority, and it shows how these researches were indicted as distractions, attempts at pacification, and misuses of funds. Reading the social encounters of 'race relations' research as moments in which state power and state-sanctioned racial knowledge were engaged and contested reveals the steady process by which the foundations of an unpopular and ineffective 'race relations industry' were cast into doubt, or consent for it refused

Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · Race, History, and American Society

  • Black women’s work in late twentieth-century Britain

    Open Access•Jessica White•Contemporary British History•2025

  • An African American Anthropologist in Wales

    Open Access•Kate Connell•Journal of British Studies•2024

  • Policing the Crisis

    Stuart Hall, Chas Critcher et al.•Policing the Crisis•2026

  • A Tactical Manoeuvre to Apply Pressure’

    Stephen Peplow, SIMON PEPLOW•Twentieth Century British History•2017

  • Legislating against Hatred

    Gavin Schaffer•Twentieth Century British History•2013

  • Managing the 'underclass

    Open Access•Paul Gilroy•Race & Class•1980

  • Sometimes antagonistic, sometimes ardently sympathetic

    Open Access•Mica Nava•Ethnicities•2013

  • Telling Stories about Post-war Britain

    Emily Robinson, Camilla Schofield et al.•Twentieth Century British History•2017

  • Race, Prostitution and the New Left

    Kate Connell, Kieran Connell•History Workshop Journal•2017

  • The liberal hour and race relations law

    Mark Bonham Carter•New Community•1987

  • Cheerleaders and ombudsmen

    Open Access•Jenny Bourne, A Sivanandan•Race & Class•1980

Unique citing works2
Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae