A Plea for Excuses
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5849974 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Holdcroft (University of Warwick, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1969 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 170 |
| Pages | 314-330 |
| Publication date | 1969-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8191 • E-ISSN: 1469-817X |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s003181910000944x |
| OpenAlex | W1996548603 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
In 'A Plea For Excuses' Austin observes that there are many situations in which a person accused of doing an action A wishes to protest that it is not altogether accurate or fair to say that he did A. The person may wish to excuse himself from an accusation of doing A on the grounds that what happened was inadvertent, or the result of an accident, or done by mistake etc. etc. Moreover if he really has an excuse, then it will no longer be possible simply to say that he did A, because it will be seen that either it is not true that he did anything at all, or that whatever he did it was not A but something else, or that he did A in such a manner that simply to say that he did it would be misleading in the extreme
Accident (philosophy · Excuse · False accusation · Mistake · Plea · Wish · Criminal Law and Evidence · Torture, Ethics, and Law · War, Ethics, and Justification
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |