A tale of two paradoxes
Media censorship in South Africa, pre-liberation and post-apartheid
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5851145 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christopher Merrett (0000-0001-7240-8484, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 50-68 |
| Publication date | 2001-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Critical Arts (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0256-0046 • E-ISSN: 1992-6049 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02560240185310071 |
| OpenAlex | W2026257382 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 16 |
Prior to liberation from apartheid, South Africa's information system laboured under a draconian system of censorship that could have crippled the media. Yet the tradition of defiance and the rise of a strong civil rights movement challenged censorship and nurtured a surprisingly wide-ranging documentary record of the national condition. The advent of democracy in 1994 heralded an era of constitutional rights and liberal legislation. But the climate of paranoia within which these operate and the demise of activist-run non-governmental organisations have ironically meant that South Africa now seems less well documented than it did during the last days of apartheid
Civil society · Demise · Freedom of information · African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues · Legal Issues in South Africa · South African History and Culture
Faulting Faultlines
The “fierce belonging” of Antjie Krog
Cases and Comments
Hate Speech in the New South Africa
The Rise of the South African Reich
The Liberal Dilemma in South Africa
The power of the powerless
The contradictions of broadcasting reform in post‐apartheid South Africa
Open Democracy
A Critical View of the Constitutional Hate Speech Provision
Political tolerance and civil society
Breaking Story
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,12 |
| Citation span | 2009 - 2020 (12) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |