Immigration and Foreign Policy in Australia and Canada
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5881709 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Peters Corbett (corresponding author), David Corbett (0009-0007-8064-4998, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1958 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 110 |
| Publication date | 1958-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-7020 • E-ISSN: 2052-465X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2307/40198388 |
| OpenAlex | W4238394757, W2320852560 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
policy plays a part in domestic politics and IMMIGRATION in international relations. Some of the leading authorities on international relations have been engaged in a great debate over which is better, a realist or an idealist approach to foreign policy. The purpose of this article is to compare the idealist and realist approaches to immigration policy and discuss their effects on domestic politics and international relations. Realism in foreign policy, espoused in the United States by such writers as George F. Kennan and Professor Hans Morgenthau, insists that each country should pursue its national interest. If all countries do this intelligently there is little danger of war. The danger of war is greatest when nations pursue ideological objectives. National ideologies are often absolute and irreconcilable, whereas national permit, and even demand, compromise. The idealists, on the other hand, say that national cannot be defined except in terms of the national Loyalty to is an ingredient of the power of a nation, and is the foundation stone of alliances. When are pursued intelligently, not recklessly, foreign policy can be consistent not only with international harmony but also with progress toward international morality and law. On the whole, the realists have made the greater impression, and have convinced many students, commentators, academics and publicists. In its later stages the debate has rather degenerated into a semantic argument about the definition of the terms interests and ideals. If interests consist mainly of ideological and spiritual needs, then the realist becomes an idealist; and if ideals boil down to national survival and welfare the idealist becomes a realist. But we can keep the terms
Development economics · Economics · Foreign policy · Immigration · Immigration policy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism · Law · Migration and Labor Dynamics
| Citations per year | 0.19 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2010 - 2016 (7) |
| Highly cited | No |