On the Rhetorical Effectiveness of Implicit Meaning-A Pragmatic Approach
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5899896 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel De Oliveira Fernandes (0000-0002-7751-8364, University of Fribourg, corresponding author), Steve Oswald (0000-0002-5946-1691, University of Fribourg) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 6 |
| Publication date | 2022-12-22 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Languages (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/languages8010006 |
| OpenAlex | W4312175771 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 70 |
This paper explores the interface between pragmatics and argumentation by considering the impact of different types of implicit meaning on different types of rhetorical effects. On the rhetorical front and drawing on classical rhetoric but going beyond the Aristotelian rhetorical triangle (ethos, logos, pathos), the paper discusses an open list of rhetorical effects affecting speakers, audiences, messages and the conversational flow of interaction. On the pragmatic front, the paper accounts for how specific features of different types of implicit meaning (presupposition, implicature and back-door speech acts) are likely to trigger specific rhetorical effects. In so doing, it discusses and justifies the need for and the feasibility of an experimental investigation of the rhetorical effectiveness of implicit meaning
Argumentation theory · Epistemology · Ethos · Implicature · Linguistics · Logos Bible Software · Meaning (existential · Pathos · Pragmatics · Presupposition · Rhetoric · Rhetorical device · Rhetorical question · Sociology · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Philosophy · Psychology
Negotiating Implicit Meaning on the Internet
Evidentiary Convincing and Evidentiary Fallacies
Multimodal Argument as Dialogue
Approaching the Study of Argumentation from an Experimental Perspective
Are Insinuated Ad Hominem Arguments Rhetorically Effective? Yes, but Conditions Apply
Questions as Elements of Argumentation in Political Debates
Pragmatic perspectives on disagreement
Confidence as an expression of commitment
New Work on Speech Acts
The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception
Quantity Implicatures
Thoughts and Utterances
Meaning and Relevance
The logic of indirect speech
The Myth of Conventional Implicature
Relevance theory explains the selection task
Confirmation Bias
Logic and Conversation
An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust
Ethos, pathos and logos in Aristotle's Rhetoric
Semantics from Different Points of View
Manipulative Shallow Processing Induced by Presuppositions and Topics
Commitment and communication
Presupposition, assertion and the encoding of evidentiality in political discourse
Pragmatique cognitive, argumentation et perlocution
The Linguistic Formulation of Fallacies Matters
“I didn't mean to suggest anything like that!”
Interpretation, relevance and the ideological effects of discursive practice
Cognition and Communication in the Evolution of Language
The semantics/pragmatics distinction
Illocution and accommodation in the functioning of presumptions
The limits of rhetoric
Toward a contemporary Aristotelian theory of rhetoric
Playing the Race Card in the Post-Willie Horton Era
Court interpreting and classical rhetoric
Ethos and Pragmatics
Utterer Meaning, Misunderstanding, and Cultural Knowledge
Do People Perceive the Disagreement in Straw Man Fallacies? An Experimental Investigation
Politeness
The evolutionary social psychology of off-record indirect speech acts
The Pragmatics of Politeness
Reasoning about a Rule
Ethos at the Crossroads of Disciplines
Perlocutions
The impasse of perlocution
Pragmatics for argumentation
What makes a straw man acceptable? Three experiments assessing linguistic factors
Cues that Matter
Innuendo
Saying, presupposing and implicating
Background relevance
Relevance and emotion
Insinuation is committing
Implicitness impact
Speech Acts
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |